From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sam Halliday Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19983: 24.4; exit-emacs regression in 24.4? Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:47:12 +0000 Message-ID: <87mw3hd8q7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87pp8rc9e5.fsf@gmail.com> <83egp6qef7.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2yrvea4.fsf@gmail.com> <83d24jlb52.fsf@gnu.org> <83bnk3lacu.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8znumft.fsf@gmail.com> <874mpsv3vw.fsf@gmail.com> <57a8zj5syu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426207707 30748 80.91.229.3 (13 Mar 2015 00:48:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:48:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19983@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 13 01:48:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YWDls-0004pM-2g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 01:48:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34569 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YWDlr-0001nl-9m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:48:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59638) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YWDln-0001nd-Nu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:48:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YWDlj-0001zw-1h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45834) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YWDli-0001zm-Ub for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YWDli-0005SR-IO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:48:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sam Halliday Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19983 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 19983-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19983.142620764820904 (code B ref 19983); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19983) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2015 00:47:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44402 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YWDlA-0005R5-3l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:47:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]:41705) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YWDl3-0005Qe-Od for 19983@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:47:26 -0400 Original-Received: by wiwl15 with SMTP id l15so2101113wiw.0 for <19983@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:47:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=vrvw8doyt1juev3IlQIrM1QPcuzO/E1hhjNeo0+8mjw=; b=Dm2M+8ojyqdBqAU8WCmYbq/Bfdayl2pFcic3QwJod+Xx/MYBaKgVlaKBt5lFfzOzr0 IYEH9P5GpbSVwrsPd4BhalXZSf3ePdkLxhgwLfCA8TPFv2q8BrNhnZQb0GIWdCEeK2z0 aSni9HpKzwDVR33jjfJAEyGwdpI3pFpY7CJUv8iao2QaFaDKhHdXKKFtzZ0oU1/n4OHe iVflzRG54tf4ti8DWPNYmGggNHQabCblmv6gSpyrt6gP+naQbD2htgk48hC4S3+vNAfp kOO5fPSmZ8B5Kte7yN5um/K/hU8hdyaWCqijaQ6hwPPv4u9UEg51Fy0+eoudVZXi3qzi N6YQ== X-Received: by 10.180.98.131 with SMTP id ei3mr91489449wib.62.1426207636179; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:47:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Samskara (cpc67152-walt14-2-0-cust277.13-2.cable.virginm.net. [82.13.129.22]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a13sm584888wjx.30.2015.03.12.17.47.14 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:47:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57a8zj5syu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100422 Archived-At: Thanks Glenn, >> ... weird bisecting results ... > > 24.3 came from a different emacs-24 branch, onto which the current > emacs-24 branch was destructively pushed (yay). I think this means that > your start point should be the revision at which the 24.3 and 24.4 > branches diverged, which I think is > 052f924a01f8a65ca0bfc9e6584302613e019489 on the current "emacs-24" > branch, which should test as good. Unfortunately, it looks like 052f924a01f8a65ca0bfc9e6584302613e019489 is bad. This commit seems to be older than 24.3 (emacs has a dev versioning convention that I don't understand). Is there another root that I could go back to? The point at which 24.3 and 24.4 have in common? I'll try it a couple of more times. It could be a random failure. Once I track down the offending commit, I'll see if I can guess what the problem is and make a minimal test. I suspect it has something to do with process handling. At the moment, building the emacs docs every commit is the bottleneck, not my test. Is there any way to build/install without the docs (or compiling the .elc files). -- Best regards, Sam