From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: vibhavp@gmail.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Add function eshell/clear to clear current eshell buffer Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 20:48:42 +0530 Message-ID: <87mw25sbvx.fsf@gmail.com> References: <874mpwhxml.fsf@gmail.com> <83lhj7lcgn.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4n7e1bn.fsf@gmail.com> <831tkz6yh1.fsf@gnu.org> <87oao23dbb.fsf@gmail.com> <20150309101126.GA11863@boo.workgroup> <83twxu5fh5.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4lpofl5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83vbgt7gqw.fsf@gnu.org> <87d231o954.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83r3rh7dsb.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429370353 19593 80.91.229.3 (18 Apr 2015 15:19:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 15:19:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 18 17:19:08 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YjUWR-0002IS-C5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:19:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45947 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjUWQ-0002ny-NI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 11:19:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60909) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjUWE-0002ni-5l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 11:18:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjUW9-00080p-3Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 11:18:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]:34873) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjUW8-00080c-Rs; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 11:18:49 -0400 Original-Received: by pabtp1 with SMTP id tp1so157272881pab.2; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:18:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=geDA0YAMX9/zrK2MpD0ptp+gNnOMZzOpjWf1vPhfOz8=; b=APJknNZfTNFod15dcL50+ze78Gvf8PDyBQCncsSkRSILi8v25EWjooBEEOUmSw2zcC jwYy87ENnenZwS7yfuvjZgtbHbV2r2q4SU70xNlFCtfld1Y21ASqCqkd+UeCImzZXaW3 +cTkYF804IbxMPWvAhQ48XqXpjs26fpTBjeAugE+YvpnjLu2cHvTtyc+hX+1tj/DSHP6 WaU6Rn4ebInhtJjw+UBz+vlbeUuMbLzbrxVI0YTX2fw0Je+azZ9eG2+8QzV8B/0LqVyx CkO+v1Kv2O5dpc2hd5C6HBZlmz6U0cT3mZ0S1/7PDMlIRGaX3Kob3YNmt5dy0JbWvPOD NBEw== X-Received: by 10.66.66.7 with SMTP id b7mr14411221pat.9.1429370327451; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from lenovog410 ([117.214.173.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xm7sm13300554pac.28.2015.04.18.08.18.45 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:18:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83r3rh7dsb.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 18 Apr 2015 16:43:16 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185599 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > So I think inventing the equivalent of E3 would be wasted > effort. It shouldn't be really that hard, my earlier patch removed the scrollback, and we call always add another command to do that. I have no problem with writing a patch for the latter. > I'm not necessarily object, but again: what would be the purpose of > removing the scrollback? what will that give you? Privacy? The scrollback might have some sensitive info, so someone might want it cleared. -- Vibhav Pant vibhavp@gmail.com