From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta Subject: Re: port x-symbol to GNU emacs 24. Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:20:47 +0000 Message-ID: <87mvxqxocw.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <87oaia6ict.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <837foxor1t.fsf@gnu.org> <878u9d7vdg.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87pp2mwu84.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: Uwe Brauer NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1439803274 7392 80.91.229.3 (17 Aug 2015 09:21:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:21:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , XEmacs Beta Discussion , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 17 11:21:03 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRGbE-0003a0-ME for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 11:21:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54808 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRGbE-0001wB-0s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 05:21:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54473) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRGbA-0001w2-Kp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 05:20:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRGb7-0001Hr-MM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 05:20:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]:33517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRGb7-0001Hb-Go for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 05:20:53 -0400 Original-Received: by wijp15 with SMTP id p15so69357183wij.0 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:20:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mat.ucm.es; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=6B2i+7kX+qIQcmIjoFsY6GhDEhs1ZiayLfDnkHN1TXU=; b=CJsMLGmmYL9W89vjS06WL9kwIZTsOivIt61zYFyxv969YZCaPfDwS0nq/1QcwIJLpc oXH+9s883hs33MqgMn3o8gd3MAQpIDz/ch6JeI/WKXKg4eSahXdIly248T9Jbz5hgZ/F TKVVtemXXlcXn2eWZS5giNqsqLB6XjmY3AWDk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:date :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=6B2i+7kX+qIQcmIjoFsY6GhDEhs1ZiayLfDnkHN1TXU=; b=Vx/k7+b4tURdIF1EqNbhvLeTihysvNrE8pqxqc6tfQIstnIlo9zNkd8I/aqj8Yi5K3 ZDiEa3rPIdDDcRyyTRsndDg3zo9Exjqj/z5315EC+99FKvla9KwQyEAbbo18rgIV8Gbv SyaTMaTWsBSSTO3NWJXCKaYvJGx06yFGlFGYu6IJZ5aGqG20i44X8vqzBtwIIu4QJMje kyJS/ydEo5URi3X6PUTxwehtAEkNb+WhZ95T5d8+hrJSZh5mMQEt2UWGlSKLUT9UrK6R tWwbXPc4PoERdRzTXvHxM0xLfrRuIvy/5e88pGXvRwa6Y7Q122wW6pMGFxBAoel/GPDN zAiA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkB17zUcPhgqWcgvXtejHpBKT+ZZNY05X6XMDXYi2F5paI831eupNtVcHNb8hfA5bTVittI X-Received: by 10.181.11.168 with SMTP id ej8mr32489816wid.83.1439803251386; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:20:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Gilgamesch ([2.160.6.104]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i1sm20942580wjq.42.2015.08.17.02.20.49 (version=TLS1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:20:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: 21.5 (beta34) "kale" 58e72e27fb81+ XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) X-Hashcash: 1:20:150817:xemacs-beta@xemacs.org::lFLjqmDNyHJ+OqSW:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000ij5 X-Hashcash: 1:20:150817:eliz@gnu.org::R0hO7tt8q0R06pF3:000002jBd X-Hashcash: 1:20:150817:stephen@xemacs.org::vpINss0XuXX6OPUa:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000uav X-Hashcash: 1:20:150817:emacs-devel@gnu.org::GKJYBa04G96zRKCT:000000000000000000000000000000000000000000B0T+ User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) XEmacs/21.5-b34 (linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188833 gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta:39305 Archived-At: >> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull writes: > Uwe Brauer writes: >> Ok, so I have to dig more into the code or hope that somebody in >> xemacs-beta could point me out what is the GNU emacs equivalent to those >> functions. I still wonder how x-symbol could have worked under GNU >> emacs 21, given that extents and specifiers did not exist neither for >> emacs 21. > Note that it's probably possible to achieve what x-symbol does in 1/5 > the code and without defining a new charset or glyphs by simply taking > advantage of the fact that most (all?) of those symbols are already in > Unicode. I believe there are TeX add-ons that allow you to use them > instead of the traditional macros, as well, so you might not even need > to fiddle the display of the TeX file at all, and x-symbol would be > completely irrelevant. Do you have any reference, or is this just a guess?