From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric? Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 00:21:53 +0900 Message-ID: <87mvwx0wdq.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <2a7b9134-af2a-462d-af6c-d02bad60bbe8@default> <834mjecdy7.fsf@gnu.org> <38061f42-eaf1-47c6-b74d-f676ac952b18@default> <83r3miatvl.fsf@gnu.org> <21998.29683.916211.867479@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <9A972800-D8F0-4DA8-877E-07D5BDC2E1F9@gmail.com> <87oahd11i9.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <8cf269bc-69d8-4752-8506-de8d992512e1@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1441725785 16792 80.91.229.3 (8 Sep 2015 15:23:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 08 17:22:53 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZKjO-00014w-5w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 17:22:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35142 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZKjN-0000Cw-1N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 11:22:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45418) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZKie-0008Sy-Nw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 11:22:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZKib-0005EI-8R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 11:22:00 -0400 Original-Received: from shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.161]:34611) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZKia-0005DI-Vx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 11:21:57 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C90441C3881; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 00:21:53 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9E2D211EF83; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 00:21:53 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <8cf269bc-69d8-4752-8506-de8d992512e1@default> X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta34) "kale" ffb5abc8dc4e XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (barebone) [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 130.158.97.161 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:189715 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > This should be a no-brainer, IMO. Put your code on ELPA and demonstrate its superiority. Since it's a no-brainer, there's no risk.