From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Contributors and maintainers Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 19:24:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87mvvcdtjd.fsf@T420.taylan> References: <83y4exe71v.fsf@gnu.org> <87zizcfzna.fsf@T420.taylan> <20151021.102719.485566340.wl@gnu.org> <871tcoehk2.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87eggofmy2.fsf@T420.taylan> <874mhkz3w5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445448276 29103 80.91.229.3 (21 Oct 2015 17:24:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 21 19:24:34 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zox7o-0002RU-4D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 19:24:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53019 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zox7n-0003cZ-DO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:24:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33447) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zox7R-0003T6-OO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:24:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zox7Q-0004j7-RL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:24:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]:34978) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zox7Q-0004ir-LG; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:24:08 -0400 Original-Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so101216100wic.0; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:24:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=X8BjcnpU1sBVLurjCCrauB9sTYELyK5y69XiUzF8C2k=; b=O6xaacZcPpw3lkmSL+yf8DtIvwkCWbaP729pfZVrSMdnmonImd8TX64YCtDlBDGtWj CqJxGyG1HLsJc2TcVrp9LJmi2j6pMbAlYYyfIODFkd1kraekiw5scEjI2rVgk4cWsxJb 5+xV/Tj1p7PTJRRoj8JhZyPVln9rnADybeTzjKOkKuPTENLqjtI9zWtrznrxgRgz+srm HuCwiAm+LuC3KNWHwqerE+13x0oijsMsktsX/H4cd6z0qJTo1iDn8NWEQupYG54cnlte 2jxS9GsZwoZy5P8RvxWXkmkPAAOLQQimS8PjyD/Jh5WzCfhRTkqmtBbDNI+ATxNAtqjw aH1g== X-Received: by 10.180.90.166 with SMTP id bx6mr33891543wib.93.1445448248115; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:24:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from T420.taylan ([2a02:908:c32:4740:221:ccff:fe66:68f0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i10sm11622534wjz.41.2015.10.21.10.24.07 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:24:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:53:14 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192303 Archived-At: "John Wiegley" writes: >>>>>> Tassilo Horn writes: > >> But wouldn't it be better to contribute a set of ERT tests for >> `shell-quote-argument' in order to increase the trust we can have in it and >> possibly find and fix problems it might actually have? > > I've asked for this several times. I'm still waiting on a response, even if > it's just, "I don't want to." Which is odd given that one of the central > complaints is that the submitter feels ignored. > > I'll ask again: Taylan, would you be willing to provide us with tests to > demonstrate the flaws in `shell-quote-argument'? Sorry that I'm not answering everything in this utter chaos, I genuinely forget. I may work on that in the future. Currently I'm way too agitated to want to spend any more effort on the code, although sorting out the social problems might be very beneficial, but that doesn't seem to go anywhere either... Taylan