From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Which version of Texinfo do we require? Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 20:25:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87mvu84gnw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448047560 9129 80.91.229.3 (20 Nov 2015 19:26:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 19:26:00 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 20 20:25:59 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzrJn-0000HO-2A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 20:25:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49507 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzrJm-0005bv-Gp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:25:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47686) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzrJY-0005bM-Vk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:25:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzrJY-0006eS-6D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:25:44 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40788) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzrJY-0006eA-2j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:25:44 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54607 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzrJX-0007TJ-Hg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:25:43 -0500 Original-Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1E074DF5EF; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 20:25:23 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:14:54 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194888 Archived-At: John Wiegley writes: > I tried building elisp.pdf in emacs-25, and the build failed on line 560 = of > frames.texi: > > @itemize @w > > Changing it to "@w{}" causes the build to go through. I'm using texinfo 6= .0. > The docs say: > > "If you don=E2=80=99t specify a mark command, the default is @bullet. I= f you don=E2=80=99t > want any mark at all, but still want logical items, use @w{} (in this c= ase > the braces are required)." > > In this a bug, or is it my version of Texinfo? The braces after @w are always required. "don't specify a mark command" means @itemize on its own without a following @w. The braces are probably not required with @itemize @bullet but I'm not sure about it. But that's likely the case that the documentation was talking about. --=20 David Kastrup