From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22083: 25.0.50; hg: adding tag enhances the rev, modeline does not reflect Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 21:36:36 +0000 Message-ID: <87mvtok26z.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <87h9jzy70u.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <566103DA.2050901@yandex.ru> <83610eioei.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb8eto9d.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <56627F41.3000805@yandex.ru> <877fkslnh3.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <5663411E.8080602@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Uwe Brauer NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449351444 14812 80.91.229.3 (5 Dec 2015 21:37:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 21:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22083@debbugs.gnu.org, Uwe Brauer To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 05 22:37:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a5KVz-0005xW-Kx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 22:37:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47837 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5KVz-0002Js-2P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 16:37:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50419) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5KVv-0002Iq-24 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 16:37:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5KVr-0003ii-18 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 16:37:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5KVq-0003iU-PO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 16:37:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a5KVq-0006XH-GH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 16:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87h9jzy70u.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Resent-From: Uwe Brauer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 21:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22083 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22083-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22083.144935142225120 (code B ref 22083); Sat, 05 Dec 2015 21:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22083) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2015 21:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40135 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a5KVp-0006X2-Gv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 16:37:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:34030) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a5KVV-0006WZ-07 for 22083@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 16:36:59 -0500 Original-Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so118876535wmv.1 for <22083@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 13:36:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mat.ucm.es; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=JenbxPSSjAXJ9M9qumDrOrA6U96yvemKhPYqOv1SLWY=; b=FFAYuwUF6BtHxcfg/3nixxjJIDtSCo98719R8+i9qu7lnqPxV6JmZWUnLkJMB8MR1M rCrDCxr4RDvVMKhR7UXbiLyuA6EjTOwbdsBsSuTh8TEnNbnb9uWOHc3/rwtjdXCBMGfr PZvk3y0xHBbonRhxmkJkMs3EbYTi0cF0KsEIk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:date :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=JenbxPSSjAXJ9M9qumDrOrA6U96yvemKhPYqOv1SLWY=; b=HmAVI0IDQ2XetAZtSjVCx8NqEW+cvCMD+YFB8bUPWZDsTZyksa13Lp5rbtm7umNEyZ q5yS5JAz5jjdOJSOHyc3Kk6hHekRTorWabawd1agBf1YpBnhhc/Ty0IzurGiv+d4VVTL jL/BU7Mzv6fKmLb1FV7lKOHomG2NtyrwlgOaMxQZBQKdmN1/v30elbVu9k2UcobGVNXd 5rOte0xnuIZs4asWf6R4HeEBozw2d42F0PcBcRCrGNRxQ4jPitDOZmwZQHb7tBgOOzJv ZnKqiuBy8o5LKmN2xgymZ5qhhXieOdDTwWN2TBvGdIAssuSsqJFbOeH0zLlNrLBDuxFf IjXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQklXJqWUybalSC4jxtA4aEAFdw/1ZHi8Nyv7jhWM1wPnvyvlg8FCBmtCySA2Y6Jq91J+fmt X-Received: by 10.28.180.132 with SMTP id d126mr11791284wmf.72.1449351399960; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 13:36:39 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Burrurr (171.pool85-55-19.dynamic.orange.es. [85.55.19.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z10sm9341280wmg.4.2015.12.05.13.36.38 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 05 Dec 2015 13:36:38 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: emacs 25.0.50.1 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) X-Hashcash: 1:20:151205:22083@debbugs.gnu.org::16+JOg0Lv7Zf9UnJ:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000yO1 X-Hashcash: 1:20:151205:dgutov@yandex.ru::p/lTBXa+z2dGbrct:017Zu X-Hashcash: 1:20:151205:oub@mat.ucm.es::a0F66NYOOPKWiF+s:000AXbd User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109675 Archived-At: > Please send the emails to the @debbugs.gnu.org address, > not bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org. > On 12/05/2015 09:11 PM, Uwe Brauer wrote: > Yes, but why? Are tags more useful to know than branches? Are branches > a subtype of tags? Is 'tip' a branch? Well adding tags changes the rev number, adding bookmarks or branches does not. I propose I will ask around in the mercurial list for opinions, not that there very many emacs users.