From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: reftex.el autoloads Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 23:15:43 +0000 Message-ID: <87mvt4g19c.fsf@russet.org.uk> References: <87h9jqo9a5.fsf@russet.org.uk> <566B2BFC.1070802@cs.ucla.edu> <877fkj1q5j.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83si375x03.fsf@gnu.org> <8737v71oo0.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83r3ir5vrb.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4czz7ul.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83oadv58fm.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9jmks0u.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87zixexam5.fsf@russet.org.uk> <0ltwnjbj6q.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87zixagvs4.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83io3xzqo3.fsf@gnu.org> <877fkcyd7r.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87vb7vh2p2.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1450653367 27278 80.91.229.3 (20 Dec 2015 23:16:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 23:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 21 00:15:58 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aAnCm-0004r3-0C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 00:15:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42361 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aAnCl-0002aP-2Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 18:15:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57483) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aAnCh-0002aG-IB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 18:15:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aAnCg-0005tw-Jx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 18:15:51 -0500 Original-Received: from cheviot12.ncl.ac.uk ([128.240.234.12]:43585) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aAnCb-0005tB-LI; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 18:15:45 -0500 Original-Received: from smtpauth-vm.ncl.ac.uk ([10.8.233.129] helo=smtpauth.ncl.ac.uk) by cheviot12.ncl.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1aAnCZ-0004LD-Ca; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 23:15:43 +0000 Original-Received: from cpc6-benw10-2-0-cust45.gate.cable.virginm.net ([92.238.179.46] helo=localhost) by smtpauth.ncl.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1aAnCZ-0000aG-MO; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 23:15:43 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sun, 20 Dec 2015 13:41:11 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 128.240.234.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196580 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > What's special about dired here? I'm working on the assumption that the problems I had with dired.el have been fixed and where a straight-forward bootstrap problem. This could be a mistaken assumption. > Ie, could the same thing happen with other files? What is special is that the diary (and all the calendar) files have four independent autoload cookies. I don't know enough about calendar to know why it needs such a complex set of autoloads, although I do wonder whether it still does. I guess the best I can do at the moment is change EMACSOPT = -batch --no-site-file --no-site-lisp to EMACSOPT = -batch --no-site-file --no-site-lisp --debug Is it possible to get hydra to build another branch (called test or something)? In the ideal world, I'd rather not do this sort of mucking around on master. And, in an entirely unrelated question, why is that "-batch" and not "--batch"? Phil