From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22172: 25.1.50; Wishlist: There should be a way to say to Emacs that is should rescale all images with a certain factor Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 12:17:37 +1100 Message-ID: <87mvra8yxa.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87bn7rya7o.fsf@gnus.org> <87zivboe85.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454980765 24593 80.91.229.3 (9 Feb 2016 01:19:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 01:19:25 +0000 (UTC) To: 22172@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 09 02:19:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aSwxU-00042f-Ca for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 02:19:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50574 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSwxT-00060f-Ls for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 20:19:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38836) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSwxO-000605-Ct for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 20:19:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSwxK-0006jN-HN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 20:19:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51580) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSwxK-0006jJ-DT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 20:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aSwxK-0000Uc-9G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 20:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22172 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22172-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22172.14549806951838 (code B ref 22172); Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22172) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2016 01:18:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60721 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aSwwX-0000TZ-Hu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 20:18:15 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:54636) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aSwwS-0000TN-No for 22172@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 20:18:12 -0500 Original-Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aSww2-0005c3-Ll for 22172@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 02:17:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87zivboe85.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:25:46 +1100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aSww2-0005c3-Ll MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1455585463.7267@Id7HiZjLY8vK2GjIVZXFkA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:112770 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > ;; If we assume that a typical character is 10 pixels in width, > ;; then we should scale all images according to how wide they > ;; are. But don't scale images down. There's also (/ (float (display-pixel-width)) (display-mm-width)) => 3.78 which might not be available... Er... that number surely can't be right. (display-mm-width) => 677 This laptop is not almost 70cm wide! It's a 13" screen, I think, so the width is like... 30cm? Something like that. So perhaps relying on typical characters is a better idea, anyway. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no