From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Richard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22814: 25.0.91; Emacs runs out of file descriptors on OS X Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:26:55 +0100 Message-ID: <87mvqnn4wg.fsf@members.fsf.org> References: <87lh673m51.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456482442 18452 80.91.229.3 (26 Feb 2016 10:27:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:27:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22814@debbugs.gnu.org To: David Caldwell Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 26 11:27:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aZFc7-0004DU-6C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:27:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48681 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZFc6-0002Px-Mc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 05:27:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47403) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZFc3-0002Pf-50 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 05:27:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZFby-00034h-67 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 05:27:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49812) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZFby-00034T-22 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 05:27:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZFbx-0004AB-Tu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 05:27:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Nicolas Richard Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22814 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22814-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22814.145648241515990 (code B ref 22814); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:27:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22814) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2016 10:26:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46939 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZFbr-00049q-GT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 05:26:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be ([164.15.128.112]:1250) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZFbp-00049h-2E for 22814@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 05:26:53 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArgGABon0FakD4Xx/2dsb2JhbABegmmCEIJqikWZQgEBAQEBAQaVQoYTAoIRAQEBAQEBZSdBEgGDbgEBBHkQCAMhJQ8BBEkTiB+9MQEBAQEGAgEdhUqFAohvBZcIjymHTYVejklig2U7LoFhhlQBAQE Original-Received: from mathsrv4.ulb.ac.be (HELO localhost) ([164.15.133.241]) by smtp.ulb.ac.be with ESMTP; 26 Feb 2016 11:26:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: (David Caldwell's message of "Fri, 26 Feb 2016 01:05:56 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113874 Archived-At: David Caldwell writes: > I guess I always assumed > it would check only for buffers I was displaying, rather than ones in > the background (because why would I care if a buffer I couldn't see had > stale data in it?). You could be using e.g. append-to-buffer (I do that on files tracked by owncloud). -- Nicolas