From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6180: 23.2; Windows XP: crash when scrolling down after 'M-x describe-fontset' or 'C-h h' Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:27:55 -0400 Message-ID: <87mvk1u1ys.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <4BEB358D.1000605@gmx.de> <87shtu7wx4.fsf@cochranmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1472084964 9003 195.159.176.226 (25 Aug 2016 00:29:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:29:24 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: David Ernst , 6180@debbugs.gnu.org To: Robert Cochran Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 25 02:29:21 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bciXo-0001zB-0w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 02:29:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53919 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bciXl-0000f1-Bn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:29:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bciXc-0000ag-3X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:29:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bciXW-0003Ir-4j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41795) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bciXW-0003Ik-15 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bciXV-0004N6-SI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:29:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6180 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6180-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6180.147208488216732 (code B ref 6180); Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6180) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2016 00:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39507 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bciWY-0004Lo-9g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]:34380) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bciWV-0004LJ-TZ for 6180@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:28:00 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f49.google.com with SMTP id e63so29739502ith.1 for <6180@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 17:27:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=ZRGUPPKISSjPOXgJ8UuRqvxLdz8PsbBnu263a/TGR9E=; b=amc26GXsfY3bbhT1WnaQQGGOk5NZeEAg2WaEfL0AYXkVexAJ9XBljWpNDhSHM0kbll xE15qLaOQl/msnqfb+PVosCT7qXsVlxPIiyXisd8JTjRAuIA1kPDgn5NXflJk5RBDqGX TIqPNjGJAEOndkS6WpKSZgN7Q7CIKh3uMmQ0nozL+6GSAYVZnL1xYtgNc2Wev1gTWqwI eJjj4PKBSbvGsxD6uPjorq/l04NfHBKG4YGnWySyZj48XHEuYztr56wE4k2NHrnPyCo2 FkbPIUCRNU0RD8g4D7pqr2RWXsmM1gvFfE/9PUy6xxhuqqpW9wrzXhuRuFfaaWYBfJFQ Uh7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=ZRGUPPKISSjPOXgJ8UuRqvxLdz8PsbBnu263a/TGR9E=; b=aSCEO6nihf0WOmPkDC5GkN9gHpSNMhteNUkqfZwBebFPSPeB8lYbXauuuiLoDzAPFk zmMip3OiLKutT7aVsBdRYGSC1PQ8QeZg3jeERnfpRe5B6bQ3qR6JPrJHZJTMzRc4dzEr zLE7jPC8FhaZR/vFA/XiwM69Awhh5FsvQoxbB5pCTYoc4R8qQuZYqjp1bXf78JO0uO+K lpvKqrfrW0xsM4HL37mae7tONEkNFy8zBMO4sQwwk/0gpehqO8mENSCjjvkCSjFt/1ia vNvt65e9LjZi7pMatKqQwwd3TfJ/TCilkfnlcrEOLdcHBpQj1Wu/KeW36kPNS0YcIHLQ c35Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuYSNsyfWb0ss2gW7qaEV5RGeTBbcVRFNC0hcxIL2ATqoaP0OWJSGhBhC4ljyOSxw== X-Received: by 10.36.107.211 with SMTP id v202mr1790256itc.51.1472084858767; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 17:27:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zony ([45.2.7.130]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o15sm16739650ith.2.2016.08.24.17.27.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Aug 2016 17:27:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87shtu7wx4.fsf@cochranmail.com> (Robert Cochran's message of "Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:07:51 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:122612 Archived-At: [Adding David Ernst back on cc, on the off chance he might still be interested after all these years] Robert Cochran writes: > Windows XP has been completely EOL'd since April 8, 2014 (a little over > 2 years at the time of writing). I'm not entirely sure of the official > policy on supporting OSes that are no longer supported by their > vendor, Well, in practice the policy is that we support whatever people are willing to provide support for. And Eli is willing to support Windows versions that are even older than XP. > The only thing that we can reasonably do IMO is check newer Windows and > see if problems persist. This sounds a lot like 23935 (i.e., it's likely to be font-specific), though Drew reported (on Windows 7) that 24.5, 23.4.1, and 22.3 did not crash when displaying HELLO. I think we may as well close both as unreproducible, as there doesn't seem to be any possiblity of making progress on them.