From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Yuri D'Elia Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26153: 26.0.50; Garbage displayed at visual line boundaries Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 18:23:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87mvci5wjl.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> References: <87tw6q6bh3.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <83h92qyaqy.fsf@gnu.org> <87r31u64nb.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <83a88iy7a8.fsf@gnu.org> <87pohe5zd2.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <838to2y1ol.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9wy5x3y.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <8360j6y093.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489857857 32150 195.159.176.226 (18 Mar 2017 17:24:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 17:24:17 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 26.0.50 Cc: 26153@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 18 18:24:08 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpI5G-0007NW-3P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 18:24:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54157 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpI5M-0001h8-5j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 13:24:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58085) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpI5G-0001gt-7P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 13:24:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpI5C-0004uU-AW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 13:24:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36018) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpI5C-0004uC-6o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 13:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpI5B-0004H0-UY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 13:24:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Yuri D'Elia Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 17:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26153 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26153-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26153.148985779516370 (code B ref 26153); Sat, 18 Mar 2017 17:24:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26153) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Mar 2017 17:23:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34217 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpI4R-0004Fy-91 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 13:23:15 -0400 Original-Received: from erc.thregr.org ([46.43.2.63]:43018) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpI4P-0004Fq-Iq for 26153@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 13:23:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [193.106.183.2] (helo=localhost) by erc.thregr.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1cpI4O-000449-4G (envelope-from ); Sat, 18 Mar 2017 18:23:12 +0100 In-reply-to: <8360j6y093.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:130706 Archived-At: On Sat, Mar 18 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> I couldn't find a "good" version yet :/ >> I can reproduce the issue further back, more than I imagined. >> I only verified that the emacs-25 tag is not affected so far. > > Could it be that the problem was caused by some change in your system, > rather than a change in Emacs? Well, I'm using debian unstable, so yes, it could. But this would mean that whatever it is, it's not affecting a build of emacs 25.2.1.