From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Kyle Meyer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: org-merger questions Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:30:17 -0400 Message-ID: <87mv8ybwue.fsf@kyleam.com> References: <874lv9fkdp.fsf@gmx.us> <87vanp5na3.fsf@bzg.fr> <87injotisu.fsf@gmx.us> <87mv906mfl.fsf@kyleam.com> <87d19vozuf.fsf@gmx.us> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1498228255 15281 195.159.176.226 (23 Jun 2017 14:30:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:30:55 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Rasmus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 23 16:30:51 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dOPbn-0003jr-DH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:30:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35701 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dOPbs-0000yl-LL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:30:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57669) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dOPbM-0000yT-PL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:30:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dOPbI-0001dV-Er for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:30:24 -0400 Original-Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:58375 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dOPbI-0001d5-BF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:30:20 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB527C0CD; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:30:18 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=6FddlnVv7VuQ LYVFK+hvkgxcVOk=; b=kBdPpin8L3fOXcFJSy1+0XBqh9GuIqeMjrlwtQ9twXhU +pI1yeiNsLIrsyf62Lc7FpnOSsdJ/6rZwPEHVb3pFjOjMMj4bIFN0xvWSDvuJ61T iN3uUUweBuLv/nNtdsy+SWe1TTbRyY4czrMOHlPk5EHLxTTZdbPMmYZd6zXUyVc= Original-Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76187C0CC; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:30:18 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [24.60.167.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B86C7C0CB; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:30:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Attribution: Kyle In-Reply-To: <87d19vozuf.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:47:04 +0200") X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7AFFB1F4-5820-11E7-A05C-61520C78B957-24757444!pb-smtp2.pobox.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=kyleam.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mesmtp; bh=6FddlnVv7VuQLYVFK+hvkgxcVOk=; b=xyOlFujZv9XjQmn/AuBuDZh98nO6iQN2a743aUr/GgWxLGI4n96KCvMWa3/lmYtWpiGF7ICrZ+jPuV2Afkbm7Jhrjg81JCmiNZEVzh8TeE56IsmCOz0LXiFIeS/lwInvqhqM1REZF5iWKxYYojkWhOj13YxqmQ+RrgtyC1epocI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 64.147.108.71 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215903 Archived-At: Hi Rasmus, Rasmus writes: [I see that most of this message is addressed by the next post, but ...] >> And a question: >> >> * Should we include the "@set DATE ..." when we replace "@include >> org-version.inc" in Emacs's org.texi? It doesn't seem like we have >> in the past (e.g., in Emacs's 6f66f53f65). > > I don=E2=80=99t know. I think we should be bound by the Emacs practice, = not what > was done in the last sync aeon ago. Principally, I think documents should > be dated. I don=E2=80=99t know if it=E2=80=99s right in an Emacs context= , as it carries > its own date. idlwave.texi and elisp.texi are the only other dated texi > files.=20=20 OK, I don't have a strong preference either way. In the future, I'll add the date line when I replace the "@include org-version.inc" line in the emacs-sync branch. --=20 Kyle