Richard Stallman writes: > > Crazy though: why don't we hot-patch existing Emacs installations? > > Concretely, that would mean including that fix in a widely used ELPA or MELPA package. Then users would get the fix upon the next update. > > This verges on a universal back door, aka "auto-upgrade" > which is a form of malware normally found in proprietary software. What if the user was asked for a confirmation before upgrading? Would that be a good solution? Cheers, Nico