From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: netsec 682578f 4/6: Add option to bypass NSM TLS checks on local networks Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 20:00:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87muupg2tb.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20180714170806.8972.58581@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20180714170809.C3A3920456@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87o9f84t89.fsf@gmail.com> <4C758D1D-7C3A-425A-852F-75E03C779E01@gmail.com> <87va9fs3ro.fsf@gmail.com> <83tvoz8bus.fsf@gnu.org> <87fu0jrvye.fsf@gmail.com> <83in5f833i.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnzm8989.fsf@gmail.com> <83o9f57tfz.fsf@gnu.org> <87va9dg8oa.fsf@gmail.com> <87r2k1g7ka.fsf@gmail.com> <83in5d7pi2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1531850327 32039 195.159.176.226 (17 Jul 2018 17:58:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 17:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 17 19:58:43 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ffUFF-0008Ca-0k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 19:58:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60755 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ffUHL-0006uT-RH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 14:00:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ffUHB-0006t9-D6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 14:00:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ffUH6-0006G3-7M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 14:00:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::436]:36820) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ffUH5-0006FT-WE; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 14:00:36 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id h9-v6so2117618wro.3; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:00:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-followup-to:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=isQAqW36phBlzXOEq7xuvMrLfDTiBLby2dQewi5eGC4=; b=HP2Orv/7fNSd26CrGKpyRP4ORLWT0/qT+AO2hDl+1Jya3frefnUgz9cJmAiNRKZDX1 7jOuIfEu9pzPRru6EhYotdBEtb/hi+u9ju7Qj6wMiTSRhkw18KOJB6pstZ9upDNCrZcj wm4f9qmvwP8JrSCaNQ1oZvDdlWboQZKi8QO6dch9HZW1kWqbpE2Jxm3ElVToZ4J3u/l5 HJHvydp7/McvTLg7t3oKATdiDlRLGZ8w6khPCPdpz8Ph9NArbOumoeJYxEy6L1JEI3d9 nBwclJr2QPAA/PNcqdcTdcKqWCLInBgSpOgBw1iRpb2RzFjtvzChm4uJMdtRMv5jCCQ0 2uwg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-followup-to :mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version; bh=isQAqW36phBlzXOEq7xuvMrLfDTiBLby2dQewi5eGC4=; b=UTm+kfwVSBWFgnKX9VnthXMiKclhwi/R6dt+f8mrO+V1OH/SG7ELJtIGe+mfV3rNdp FroIJeOEIENKpg7dNPa0KIEqweMMCGj6QGpaprFGtgs/r+VS02fJzmONbjL8KuKk4/Zd LTAf8CxwrlHSiu2NiEDxSWhoxGctSr+7pixENEyYQuB2BV0jmszqex42z5TbSjHaCrnF +Wj1yc2ZhmfgKocTC2EWuemQnExNcqpZh+4J2kmqyB7ONbmQDiYh1jiEFKOx9DbeBIHj utXlzE6RUhtp1+mSd7uMZ3QtCxH2O6Q/1/MBJZ17ctr68nv58+jel1eBgV0PlpbVX5tu mJCA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlHMPNfbfFX9AFHsx+1qEve/BNPnP9n8SmwQPO6zOwfi2IkzNfCH eJsxtmKUzi97+aFckYl2qPdp059R X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcV5kdVGmDTnbBN8oPXIHofpASbgsEFvijzeC2PMQtk58wfFqcxW/djQ52ILUnk7XCxdftPiw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:b2a7:: with SMTP id g36-v6mr2069431wrd.218.1531850434347; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim (vav06-1-78-207-202-134.fbx.proxad.net. [78.207.202.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v1-v6sm3625143wrs.34.2018.07.17.11.00.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:00:33 -0700 (PDT) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <83in5d7pi2.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 17 Jul 2018 20:15:17 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::436 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:227510 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Robert Pluim >> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 18:17:57 +0200 >> >> I couldn't get my original to fail with a unibyte string. Turns out >> that even though size_byte is indeed -1 for unibyte strings, in that >> case SBYTES returns the size field: >> >> ptrdiff_t nbytes = s->u.s.size_byte < 0 ? s->u.s.size : s->u.s.size_byte; > > Ah, yes. I keep forgetting that. Which is one more reason not to > rely on that, if you ask me ;-) STRING_MULTIBYTE it is then. Robert