From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Achim Gratz Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33328: 27.0.50; Extend Emacs bug report Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 20:14:56 +0100 Organization: Linux Private Site Message-ID: <87muq0exfz.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <87pnvdgah9.fsf@gmx.de> <87r2fmccbl.fsf@gmx.de> <12r2ffmv58.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87bm6ipphi.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1542914049 6196 195.159.176.226 (22 Nov 2018 19:14:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 19:14:09 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) To: 33328@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 22 20:14:05 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPuQM-0001Q0-Jt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 20:14:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49015 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPuSS-0008LE-P0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:16:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39930) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPuSM-0008L8-4b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:16:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPuSI-0000ns-P5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:16:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38415) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPuSI-0000nV-Lu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPuSI-0006UX-Cq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:16:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87pnvdgah9.fsf@gmx.de> Resent-From: Achim Gratz Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 19:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33328 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.154291411724891 (code B ref -1); Thu, 22 Nov 2018 19:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2018 19:15:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42673 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPuRZ-0006TN-Ap for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:15:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58372) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPuRX-0006T8-Oo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:15:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPuRR-0007bM-Vg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:15:10 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:41073) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPuRR-0007b5-Sy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:15:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39748) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPuRR-0008E9-0A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:15:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPuRN-0007O0-Ki for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:15:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=38114 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPuRN-0007J9-DU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:15:05 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPuPD-0008Ne-U9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 20:12:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 39 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:YcX0ZoTlVXno32fTXXPbQ30kcUg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:152682 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: > A version number is not sufficient. It depends, which branch is checked > out. See for example It is quite useless to ask which branch a given commit is on, since it could be on any number of branches, only some of which might be shared between your repo and the repo of the reporter. > # ( cd ~/src/emacs ; git name-rev d2a07b9a82a632e8baa179c667a98d275e5f6973 ) > d2a07b9a82a632e8baa179c667a98d275e5f6973 remotes/origin/scratch/accurate-warning-pos~44 ~/lisp/emacs-master> git branch --contains d2a07b9 * blafasel master I've just created and checked out a new branch blafasel, then asked git to name the (local) branches that have this commit. I generally don't pull feature branches and similar namespaces, but almost always work on local branches. > # ( cd ~/src/emacs-test ; git name-rev d2a07b9a82a632e8baa179c667a98d275e5f6973 ) > d2a07b9a82a632e8baa179c667a98d275e5f6973 remotes/origin/HEAD~89 > > The former is a master checkout, the latter is a > feature/tramp-thread-safe checkout. Just the revision > d2a07b9a82a632e8baa179c667a98d275e5f6973 doesn't tell me the branch the > original bug report has been written for. So, what information would you gain if you learned it was branch "blafasel"? Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra