From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34588: 27.0.50; Doc of write-contents-functions: arguments? Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 03:59:21 +0100 Message-ID: <87mumponhy.fsf@web.de> References: <87bm3715bu.fsf@web.de> <83y36agz88.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="140298"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 34588@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 21 04:00:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gweao-000aMm-Qe for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 04:00:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53501 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwean-00070n-Oz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 22:00:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gweah-00070O-E9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 22:00:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gweag-000567-OA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 22:00:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58101) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gweag-00055t-Jm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 22:00:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gweag-0000Nl-BY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 22:00:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 03:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34588 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34588-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34588.15507179811411 (code B ref 34588); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 03:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2019 02:59:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58867 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gweaL-0000Mh-AA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 21:59:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:46299) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gweaI-0000MR-Nh for 34588@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 21:59:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1550717966; bh=AvP6qhhtGYeLvZ3nu4Za9oDtpDjLNB6/QGIuE/faFBE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=CgmQ+iVi9ZNXDNXVL+nl80aAMN6DzW/pFO1GTInEOa2ueHGy+n+F6Lg504MqJU5qF 196XMjtZVO5kw4PNL/Isi096oYJxT/WAKfUy2lJoYZdLs3D6pHd6JMVaQocbC5E9aX h6Og/KaTmi/3ald3lphrEAmYQxuvFjohlpm9XHig= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([88.67.111.211]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0McFgl-1gdkPy3S7z-00JdFx; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 03:59:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83y36agz88.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 20 Feb 2019 19:13:11 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:7kmZ5H7gWaXdzxUt74/5P4X0Wf2DpBnblBwTZ8aaVh6DaJKmrOd 25agb0nA6Y2PxmgV5DbemHSjN7SAzCCijT/hBjCbvEpcbV8vV5/9BjxNmqVg2bChOOSWpeG eLgajdOjvmNrnM+icFdUz8SE5spOzGjKliVRoGtAU94WKcFZyILr8IoIM/1JtuGTZ89COJO XD0wS7ULcT8YR1e38c+NQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:pvZdE3GByIA=:Hn9jjd8NULyI2VRv8hw7A3 xJU31VjVtWjGzgeUq6yzDVc5tpQKScR4/eTFaTbIIvLBnFApll+rIP3lKdddw7R2juHEC5slD eECnc+0Htu2rsap6win9earX2B0lrc3/4l273ZXAshqe7z6NeRtKFtQZhHPlM0TL7mQpmGemp fcFkWce9pGobXJSwrlMVjDhoYaK7gABXQE0XrdLeobie09keqg1WliwdngYN9ckWKHlN3Haq7 +W28CL29krjUNjaAzYbtQt/g1AHQH9zV+Z+OZsDMc6PDzvTmPZf7BHXWcgnvUc8ihucDUxNUR pyXDjZ3J91/sgmzNpmXGnazPVMHtO0jOYmbo4BjYOfPN2uU+wCaSEoMglF11uvIFjuUUA9RCh sBqjqijWN6cl/WCt4FpGu6+FE91O8wmTQGWSHT8t9/+9tFh/u6zRuKF4iIhjvzeFqN+xK5/db fXSdCzJdIKcVDQGu0I5zSLEUV3/Q718mtWKgO+v6v+bK+ybIkvn9OZz3twzT7s9dA6DP90SRj m6ENXTcX5Ox9u8sGPphQijt2CoULR8k3xlNdHIjk61z7x0aFUAUlds9HNZs6rvZl5L0JmGTRe oJwoVzrUVTr5id8s647tTWYBSNCnd7R2ZpVDVOn/cBF9A9sFv4vE7W7fYHbmT5oetHvJDK2m/ 27MDYC6WgpfIogkAdgXeVHvQYhNPznc9cX1VujL3FRrMEHMzjbFPi3WISi6umuCq+wK870ALs AFH8OTEgLt3qqo0iqH7Pg36DO0voh4S6TNFfGkvOc0GTBx5tDffmBcRzAvmy9Yv94WZxByYO X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155607 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I agree it would be good to say that in the doc string (yes, no > arguments is the right answer). Ok, good. > Is it less confusing now? Yes, I'm fine with doing that to fix this. Thanks, Michael.