From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34992: 26.1; message-send-mail-with-mailclient mangles MIME messages Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:06:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87muewrnnr.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87y353f7kp.fsf@tethera.net> <83zhpjm06y.fsf@gnu.org> <83va05lgx5.fsf@gnu.org> <8736n9bloi.fsf@tethera.net> <87lfzat9cc.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87v9wyt6aq.fsf@tethera.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="10149"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 34992@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org To: David Bremner Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 23 00:07:15 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCA0g-0002SX-Kf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:07:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51146 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iCA0f-0001xa-6e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 18:07:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37905) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iCA0W-0001vd-LY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 18:07:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCA0V-00018D-LZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 18:07:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54033) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCA0U-00017d-Lu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 18:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCA0U-00087O-Fg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 18:07:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 22:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34992 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34992-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34992.156919001531178 (code B ref 34992); Sun, 22 Sep 2019 22:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34992) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2019 22:06:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34618 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCA0N-00086m-BS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 18:06:55 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:47504) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCA0L-00086d-7n for 34992@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 18:06:54 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCA0H-000317-6Z; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:06:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87v9wyt6aq.fsf@tethera.net> (David Bremner's message of "Sat, 22 Jun 2019 09:42:21 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166948 Archived-At: David Bremner writes: >> So it would perhaps make sense to tell the user that you can't send >> attachments via -with-mailclient if you try to do that? > > Sorry for the long delay in replying. Indeed, signalling an error to the > user makes sense to me in this case. I've now made it warn the user in these circumstances. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no