From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21729: doc-view messed up by early auto-revert Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 15:03:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87muenl0fl.fsf@gnus.org> References: <874mhjtoc2.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb9zx7j2.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv12szdz.fsf@members.fsf.org> <87ziz9vqw5.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="127699"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 21729@debbugs.gnu.org, Nicolas Richard , Stefan Monnier To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 29 15:04:50 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEYsb-000X6X-Vf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 15:04:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39284 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iEYsa-0005wC-8Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:04:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iEYry-0005vl-5f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:04:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iEYrt-0002Cj-B9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:04:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43781) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iEYrq-00029m-Qy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEYrq-00027f-Gx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 13:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21729 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 21729-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21729.15697621978094 (code B ref 21729); Sun, 29 Sep 2019 13:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21729) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Sep 2019 13:03:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52598 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEYr6-00026S-U4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:03:17 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:53928) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEYr5-00026L-W9 for 21729@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:03:16 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEYr1-0000wa-4e; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 15:03:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ziz9vqw5.fsf@gnu.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Fri, 23 Oct 2015 12:08:26 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:167664 Archived-At: It seems the original issue reported here was fixed, but then an enhancement request is discussed: Tassilo Horn writes: > Alternatively, we could of course enhance autorevert.el, e.g., by > introducing some buffer-local variable `auto-revert-predicate' which is > run by auto-revert in order to test if the current buffer can be > reverted right now. That could then be used by doc-view, and I guess > there are other modes which could make use of such a feature, too. > > Stefan, do you think that would be a good idea? I'm not Stefan, but I think that sounds like a good idea. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no