From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23966: 25.1.50; Frame resizing due to tool bar + Gnus Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 11:29:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87mu3arc6u.fsf__32813.0984607682$1596533468$gmane$org@gnus.org> References: <87vb09u40u.fsf@gmx.net> <57867BB6.1020601@gmx.at> <87r3axtkcf.fsf@gmx.net> <578754F3.9060800@gmx.at> <87a8hkpmq8.fsf@gmx.net> <5787CCF5.3000404@gmx.at> <87eg6wghgl.fsf@gmx.net> <874lkgtqnk.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87h8ofcvqb.fsf@gmx.net> <87wo2zmr20.fsf@gnus.org> <87eep6a6w7.fsf@rub.de> <877duyjzsr.fsf@gnus.org> <87y2neikt1.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="883"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 23966@debbugs.gnu.org, ding@gnus.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 04 11:31:03 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k2tHj-00007M-CD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 11:31:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36406 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2tHi-0008Ll-EA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 05:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46548) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2tGl-0007ox-5X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 05:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35276) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2tGk-0000ml-RA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 05:30:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2tGk-0001vh-MJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 05:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 09:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23966 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 23966-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23966.15965333987339 (code B ref 23966); Tue, 04 Aug 2020 09:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23966) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2020 09:29:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46820 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2tGf-0001uJ-Lk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 05:29:57 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:53952) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2tGe-0001u5-3R for 23966@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 05:29:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=mOrGi6ArycXsN7fX5WSjcrsu3Y/JWuhfDyZTsefrAZo=; b=GDcA2xxGABKV5kOkg8iGgWjI2m F6tfnVUhTVOdrVoq9IVLQwo+CLlmA5gDOm7hjDMHmL0t5SWg/Kzsv0p4N6jvrBh3CrawgqJTKMV5S ixkA5IT8nPLsl7PYCqLoforF/7bRhYgB0iqMEY7a6Q5Nonczf/nxl20ZeEadm0tbhNfY=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k2tGU-0006Ar-St; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 11:29:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y2neikt1.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:43:06 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:183983 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > As somebody who doesn't use tool bars normally, I'm wondering -- do we > really need two different tool bar styles in Gnus? Can't we just rip > out the `retro' stuff and thing will possibly be less confusing? Perhaps somebody on the Gnus mailing list has some input here. To recap -- there's some bugs in enabling the Summary mode tool bar, because there's some setup being done at Gnus load time. This can be fixed, I'm just wondering whether the proper fix here is to simplify the code. There's currently two tool bars for Gnus summary mode: gnus-summary-tool-bar-retro gnus-summary-tool-bar-gnome I propose to get rid of the -retro one. Does anybody object to that? Or is the -gnome tool bar really specific to Gnome, and it won't work on other OS-es or something? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no