From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: comint-output-filter-functions and multi-line input Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:32:55 +0000 Message-ID: <87mt9p68s8.fsf@localhost> References: <87y1tgqhmc.fsf@localhost> <87v8oidtzl.fsf@miha-pc> <87pmepg0oo.fsf@localhost> <87sfjlegu8.fsf@miha-pc> <87a65tfuso.fsf@localhost> <87o7u9e62q.fsf@miha-pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20135"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: miha@kamnitnik.top Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 21 07:35:35 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1olkgw-00053c-Ql for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 07:35:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olkgu-0008B5-Dy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 01:35:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [::1] (helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olkdw-0005FN-5b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 01:32:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olkdr-00058J-Qj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 01:32:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olkdj-0007Ll-OD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 01:32:23 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1370240027 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 07:32:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1666330332; bh=gmAkFukdsfKtdWQ8bO0DsQrv3Vz6N20UTk57rqRzKD8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=cFQvxJ8IfaC6OtyPVbllBU98jiib5BkY6E7Hk2cMGMUFlBnaXXu9OE1IW8DXJxNHy pQZTT50rodSDq7R6Frqg4bcgTqFMJu+CXVBWkcuyvDHcZ8RUrZt8E0kVmorE6TtNk4 fpoz6/p9I9Qby4Vno+OhjEeOtyoR4VRIT4jzKkPC93kFJ7kBxfaAXmkwBgmNSE5odP rvEHS9UO7CAwY6u/4DCFq7DgtT0qF6fuAPlhrfIhc4sL3H8rRrSAXtxiyitdUjMn/v oRFCmCyYQwtv+jDgautflq0ziIfNoF0R0+N0XOmO0HAQ12BnFTtRAV09b7VkFYrPLL DJf8ejTCOCjjg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4MttQ25mdsz6tqD; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 07:32:10 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87o7u9e62q.fsf@miha-pc> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:298193 Archived-At: writes: >> So, I'd prefer comint-based solution. >> Such solution may also benefit other comint uses beyond this specific >> issue with Org. > >>> Or maybe inject something like 'oldps=$PS2; PS2=""' before the command >>> and 'PS2=$oldps' after the command. But whether this works could depend >>> on the shell, some shells might have something like $PS3 or $RPS1, for >>> example. > >> But will accept-process-output correctly work with PS2=""? > > Looking at the code in ob-shell.el, it probably wouldn't just work if > you were to prepend your command with PS2="". You'd probably have to > move accept-process-output at the end outside of the loop. (Inside the > loop, accept-process-output could wait forever, since the process > wouldn't print anything, PS2="" after all.) At the end, I did go into PS2="", but instead of sending script line-by-line, I just send it once and for all outside the loop, as you suggested. It also works and looks less fragile. Also, I figured something called PROMPT_COMMAND, which can also interfere with prompt. Just using PS1/2 is not always enough. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at