From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Po Lu via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59306: 29.0.50; Resurrected bug? Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 10:10:02 +0800 Message-ID: <87mt8qgwlh.fsf@yahoo.com> References: <874juzhufg.fsf@yahoo.com> <09149639-b159-e407-0965-489415aa3520@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Po Lu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31255"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 59306@debbugs.gnu.org, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 17 03:11:15 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ovUN0-0007wD-Qb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 03:11:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ovUMq-0002jB-6r; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 21:11:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ovUMo-0002iv-3p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 21:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ovUMn-0004g5-Pm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 21:11:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ovUMn-0003KQ-Kg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 21:11:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Po Lu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 02:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59306 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59306-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59306.166865102112743 (code B ref 59306); Thu, 17 Nov 2022 02:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59306) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2022 02:10:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58623 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ovUM8-0003JT-Ss for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 21:10:21 -0500 Original-Received: from sonic311-25.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.188.206]:43718) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ovUM6-0003JD-Gd for 59306@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 21:10:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1668651010; bh=TlwNRevuKwQDmqfkOgF5n3kNqNCx0eRMSAQ8/VQSG4Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=QhoIbiZBOEnUVHMAeq0mgSK2q8bwQhhWWMzpcs+q3GMeAuWvt5aqdXvQjAXFy2CaQfM+SSVxAry2ndJbQMSAPPXAu1ckSutkpMBfCUvd4uYzK3gJF82qG+vzPcoYgfjsX6ffj2wbyNeEYIcdAh7kabBxqQFfg4ruKBtSFY9L+677UHS60CdUXIjfd7XIsHQ4PTTVIQmkpwXz1qTqukEfu5LeLwy8IPQzY43RkvTN86se6a/vspGqzWB1xclp6CnN+cakKtowRieS3AHG8XdiY2kZhKic7lccNJGBdSHYaqc1jpEWsxzev+tt4t4Clx8ox8V3whdhir6lk+L9UJRNQg== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1668651010; bh=cJzOINJRCIEkIiUcjJBqN/4dT1oMqlgk2+952FgiFZc=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=uTumhsexPZ2ozfrOhDpYkj4oLZCOwh0k27Fvq1RgeIA1ZbAinFEsG8rBSmlX3FuRc989m6SJO0JbpO70yK31wdvWiB+PBwZQzv7BuYc3qQF5ydqN4hj0S7XtLm+OGrnV4uphURuHT3ya9oJk3TOoX40OHzl4MPVSsVnmAmaqrSKkMmQTw7EYzcC0Yqr+hJUHeM1SijlU0xQXro/8AyGT1iyi9psfRHA0FiqxOFX+gr6ZkMfswt1pZTjgJDGdISrbSvWsXvmX/i2fGOw51vW2KPU3otjNc9Wh4D6UXpBGDqm6GOM3AXzZLZIYG5+MuFVRrKgOdl8MHZKjf/BDmNwhcw== X-YMail-OSG: gJgsYcMVM1nyO5mnqRRE7NQZCACYygFRjzOuHZx3BxE0BWn8S4_mrkghwzSTogD YTDdXzVwAKTE2c4iy4.zZLmVYr26cpzxeh9e8MUjM1cw2nUdJgtNj4iAWEhYpuh2VivtCEeJyS7y zjV0qREfsHz..s1KeTZOhYASmrufmt_EcYwAcbhVlCQviGRVCVkJ6F9euKGDmmHjcKs_pTJZM5fa IgJ_Pu298_FajbSHegGCzVjVl8uXDofWv9zRmv0Hix7p.an8vQMKZU5kQC2gahJxzuoa_fQ87bH8 pGX_YATIP3czQJ_48rL.0iKac90EOyyx89qrcGsVRuGT4l5e0loA0wxZJt6Da0MCxnGe9Djhs3Ss w2Ul00ijsoDAb0uJZcMleIaH.eUJy02OhsT41Kw3iiDhULxgf0tl891oBuRB5aearER_1tnx5jFr ZfdRt2RnTIm5E2m0._earCQz12lYZbRGBgnIvIUQn1G4xnwvg7Zht7x6Da_XDhi0f_Bl9aWI.kXz exfCUyE6G50jyIsCiamAnF5bYtH490HjKwyflVVboWq.BloeVzct9HtaLoHhdhcahkFyNsY.ZZaX gnFZ914dD4hmPUDbxxjKPqp5ueojXN27i6LfRYGERlcLMPC8IdY22wDAhms5.D7pBMy5Cz.05JfK rLx.oKgxqONbIMwkOpQfVC4j2M7Lkuswiktlb1_xL6UNjdInB9iSQBJC5DPRsVsnNg_OZDvqhXE8 CfUw2na1Y_AzZDuM2cXQbIrTJbYSLewd8OPPJlJeB5vvX_leupxyKGbyZkMBZ3SlIEXV4lQ_FpLZ GW1eP02e76UNSSjQY6TOTSLevGWuGVvxXd.pT1MDJT X-Sonic-MF: Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic311.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 02:10:10 +0000 Original-Received: by hermes--production-sg3-6c8895b545-gbdk9 (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 99fed6628be95e3c936e1b28702eff3a; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 02:10:06 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <09149639-b159-e407-0965-489415aa3520@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Thu, 17 Nov 2022 03:28:24 +0200") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.20863 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:248070 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > Since this bug sounds similar or at least related to bug#58912, I > probably should comment: > > Rebuilding from the latest master makes the scenario in bug#58912 much > better, in that the font size is applied correctly at the end. > > It's still different from Emacs 28 in that the frame size goes through > an extra transition at the end of loading. And sometimes through 1 > more (the last one the same as the -2nd one). So sometimes I end up > with a window of 84x37, and sometimes (less frequently) 80x35. All > according to window-height and window-width. > > Emacs 28 and an older build of master both end up at 80x35. > > But at least the font size and family are ok now. I guess Cairo just refuses to tell us what the DPI it defaults to using is, so Emacs always ends up having to redraw the fonts at startup. Please give me a while to think up a solution.