From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Lookarounds and recursion in Emacs regexes Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2023 22:48:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87mt5tje44.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <87h6wbeti3.fsf@mbork.pl> <877cx7n5an.fsf@dataswamp.org> <878rhelfks.fsf@dataswamp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10464"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:lbkZQI+impzpcpXPgazjS+vBl4c= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 05 14:15:18 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pOerW-0002Vu-05 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 14:15:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pOerC-00043h-SU; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 08:14:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pOQQB-0006np-DN for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 16:50:07 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pOQQ8-00028f-G7 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 16:50:06 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pOQQ6-0004yE-ER for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 22:50:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 08:14:57 -0500 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:142610 Archived-At: Jean Louis wrote: >>> Although somewhat proficient, I never learnt to love Python. >> >> People don't love Python like they do Lisp, but no doubt it >> has it's good sides - development speed not the least. > > Do you want to say that development speed in Lisp is slower > than in Python? Lisp is a family of languages, if we talk Elisp then Elisp is faster for anything Emacs related obviously, if we talk everything else then Python is faster. If we talk Common Lisp vs Python, then Python is, in general, faster. We then consider the languages themselves, the technology around, but also the huge spread of Python while Lisp is either a fringe language or - actually that's our common ground - the underground. -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal