From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2023 08:11:35 +0000 Message-ID: <87msy5gfk8.fsf@localhost> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <8734zztmiz.fsf@localhost> <87sf7zqs3l.fsf@yahoo.com> <87il8vs6e7.fsf@localhost> <87jztbqrc9.fsf@yahoo.com> <877cpbs5a0.fsf@localhost> <87fs3zqqgj.fsf@yahoo.com> <874jkfs4o0.fsf@localhost> <87y1hroz47.fsf@posteo.net> <83cyz2ctp0.fsf@gnu.org> <87msy6rzeg.fsf@localhost> <83wmxab0ym.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8cuqg8d.fsf@localhost> <83ttseava1.fsf@gnu.org> <87zg26hvfq.fsf@localhost> <83o7imatsn.fsf@gnu.org> <87pm32htc5.fsf@localhost> <83il8uas6i.fsf@gnu.org> <83fs3yarw9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33839"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de, philipk@posteo.net, luangruo@yahoo.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 02 10:11:43 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qcLjK-0008by-SA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 10:11:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcLih-0005dh-Ui; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 04:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcLif-0005bc-UQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 04:11:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcLic-0005o4-KI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 04:11:01 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33E14240028 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2023 10:10:56 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1693642256; bh=fXF6uZmDS950kUx9st1FeONP3NKVG9d2AUgD4nvpjlU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=YQihlm3vlPUV1CpwGdS0WUH8t4SAv/IZKCyvrm8q9uc8bYCqCIrJNAmHjN3lpxBqL 6N+MQjLrXhKfqsot7L3KmojaPS9k1ZJCkgmMXkyydvxKUCtxo7G8Ua46mv6nBkimYZ DjGXT29z6TiuxcG4PFZtQLlcPN8mAp47oh/P7cS7U8YI4VIo62hOC5HQ7DdIbr3Ucv hHAkfW6UXN32de2NUNv44GR2k1MPJZq8WUSu1MQZGrDkzUwTZRNyCxcY7sGc+SDq4f WdXDAAzwT4v1GdftZxG11Z/YNcflhm8Jfni0MSC8d4Vq9S2Wdvdu7VlXfXyMyuNVst t/J9QzKFldPgQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Rd6zL6nS5z6tvn; Sat, 2 Sep 2023 10:10:54 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83fs3yarw9.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309855 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > We are clearly using different MUA. I can see previous emails easily. >> >> So can I, but it is much easier to respond to a message when the >> context is in the same message than having to look it up up-thread. I can see your point. Although, I still hold on my point of view that it is more a question of community guidelines. My email client is not unique - Gmail and other web UIs for email threads often employ Github-like view, which would have the same net effect if we consider that it is the UI that is driving people to avoid quoting. > And then, of course, I regularly purge my inbox, at which point > looking up previous emails becomes even harder. That sounds like your MUA deficiency. Looking up previous emails is critical, even when the established email etiquette is to quote previous messages. Sometimes, too much context is lost in the quote. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at