From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Code for cond* Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:34:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87mssuelmh.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <874jf3rkzx.fsf@yahoo.com> <87le8ehqew.fsf@localhost> <87zfwurjv4.fsf@yahoo.com> <87cytqhn35.fsf@localhost> <87r0i6rfjg.fsf@yahoo.com> <874jf2hkxo.fsf@localhost> <87frymre9b.fsf@yahoo.com> <871qa6hjtq.fsf@localhost> <87y1ceeoo3.fsf@dataswamp.org> <8734umg0cu.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35736"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:Xii7FRylYL/lQNixA1pezrKnhVY= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 24 18:09:49 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rSgl2-00094O-Ej for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:09:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSgkD-0005oL-4w; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:08:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSgCo-00051t-DZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 11:34:27 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSgCm-0002In-09 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 11:34:25 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rSgCj-0000p4-VT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:34:21 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:08:55 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:315326 Archived-At: Ihor Radchenko wrote: >>> I am not sure if pointing this out is constructive. >>> Coming from the same crowd or not, the useful arguments >>> should be considered. >> >> Yes but we heard from you that the goal was to replace >> `pcase'. It was the view of two people. The third is not >> here, he is staying low? > > This is not my view. This is my understanding of > RMS' intent. > > My view is "anything that improves Emacs is good". I do not > have more specific goals in this thread. Sorry for the confusion, you are right, I replied to your post technically but actually said that to the person _you_ were quoting. -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal