From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Benjamin Riefenstahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some experience with the igc branch Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 15:42:49 +0200 Message-ID: <87msglxkme.fsf@turtle-trading.net> References: <87o713wwsi.fsf@telefonica.net> <86seqe4j4f.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttaucub8.fsf@protonmail.com> <87pllicrpi.fsf@protonmail.com> <86bjx24ad0.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyhicocg.fsf@protonmail.com> <867c7q4592.fsf@gnu.org> <87y106cfb2.fsf@turtle-trading.net> <87jzbqas1d.fsf@protonmail.com> <86seqd2s8k.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11788"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Pip Cet , gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com, acorallo@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 24 14:43:50 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tQ5CP-0002tp-1Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 14:43:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tQ5BZ-00023h-4j; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 08:42:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tQ5BV-00020R-Rt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 08:42:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.turtle-trading.net ([18.197.215.73]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tQ5BU-00006J-HF; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 08:42:53 -0500 Original-Received: from buscust18-02.static.cytanet.com.cy ([46.199.71.2] helo=arrian) by mail.turtle-trading.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1tQ5BS-000000006lh-3Jpc; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 14:42:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86seqd2s8k.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 24 Dec 2024 14:14:03 +0200") Received-SPF: none client-ip=18.197.215.73; envelope-from=b.riefenstahl@turtle-trading.net; helo=mail.turtle-trading.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327010 Archived-At: >> From: Pip Cet >> [...] >> "Benjamin Riefenstahl" writes: >> >> The allocation thread approach should work for all of them. If we have >> stdatomic.h, performance should be acceptable. JFTR, that quote wasn't from me, I believe it belongs to Pip. ;-)