From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lute Kamstra Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: foreground menu bug Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 12:30:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87ll4xl8aq.fsf@xs4all.nl> References: <20050615.071604.11389732.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119781716 15152 80.91.229.2 (26 Jun 2005 10:28:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 10:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 26 12:28:34 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DmUMy-0008Gv-QX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 12:28:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DmUUO-000141-Pq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 06:35:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DmUSs-0000SJ-RN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 06:34:15 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DmUSq-0000Qv-DU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 06:34:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DmUSq-0000Q1-37 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 06:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.109.24.27] (helo=smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DmUT8-0004mc-SH; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 06:34:31 -0400 Original-Received: from pijl (a80-127-67-124.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.127.67.124]) by smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5QAUMLo070160; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 12:30:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Lute.Kamstra@xs4all.nl) Original-Received: from lute by pijl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DmUP7-0004lE-00; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 12:30:21 +0200 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard M. Stallman's message of "Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:46:23 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Original-Lines: 13 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39549 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39549 "Richard M. Stallman" writes: > Or, it could just warn the user that the highlighting will not be > visible since font lock is enabled? > > It would be possible, but why be so complicated? > This change seems to do the right job. You asked if someone would like to work on this and I said I would. In the meantime I've written a functional equivalent patch. It's a bit a waste of resources to do double work. Lute.