From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building Emacs overflowed pure space Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:44:48 -0400 Message-ID: <87lkqqwk9b.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <7dbe73ed0607180138x35e9d9bft3e42f20cb369795c@mail.gmail.com> <200607181855.k6IItgAV027751@jane.dms.auburn.edu> <200607182201.k6IM1fjg001522@jane.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153266273 15153 80.91.229.2 (18 Jul 2006 23:44:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 23:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 19 01:44:32 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G2zEl-0004W4-I8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 01:44:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G2zEl-0002jh-02 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:44:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G2zEX-0002jb-Ie for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:44:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G2zEW-0002jO-4m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:44:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G2zEW-0002jL-0F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:44:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [18.19.1.138] (helo=cyd) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G2zHV-0006Dz-KJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:47:13 -0400 Original-Received: by cyd (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9323E4E2AF; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:44:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200607182201.k6IM1fjg001522@jane.dms.auburn.edu> (Luc Teirlinck's message of "Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:01:41 -0500 (CDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57295 Archived-At: > I observed that .elc's compiled by bootstrap-emacs have `dolist' > expanded by cl.el, whereas those compiled by emacs have > subr.el-version. Actually, bootstrap-emacs loads cl.el via preloaded > .el files that contain (eval-when-compile (require 'cl)), where > `eval-when-compile' just behaves like `progn'. Incidentally, why do we still have separate `dotimes' and `dolist' functions in cl-macs.el? Would we ever lose anything by using the subr.el version?