From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ralf Angeli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.auctex.devel Subject: Re: CVS repository synchronization for RefTeX Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:18:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87lkkp19bi.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> References: <87k60b7hv5.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> <87sley46bb.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> <87mz554e1u.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> <87r6uh1alp.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167506350 18629 80.91.229.12 (30 Dec 2006 19:19:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: auctex-devel@gnu.org, carsten.dominik@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 30 20:19:09 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H0jjV-0007ut-Dd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:19:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0jjU-0003gk-Nv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:19:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0jjC-0003dv-1l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:18:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0jjA-0003bX-76 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:18:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0jjA-0003bO-4R; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:18:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [212.227.126.177] (helo=moutng.kundenserver.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H0jj8-0001wM-Nb; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:18:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [84.165.65.74] (helo=neutrino.caeruleus.net) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu2) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwtQ-1H0jj73aiV-0006x7; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:18:42 +0100 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat\, 30 Dec 2006 21\:03\:26 +0200") X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:abf9ffac21f8345504ac40c53d3b40ba X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64520 gmane.emacs.auctex.devel:1483 Archived-At: * Eli Zaretskii (2006-12-30) writes: >> From: Ralf Angeli >> >> As Carsten wrote, RefTeX has been mainained outside of Emacs and seen >> releases independent of Emacs ever since. So there currently is no >> problem with the length of Emacs' release cycle. There would be a >> problem, however, if one followed your suggestion not ot release >> RefTeX independently of Emacs anymore. > > Sorry, but you are just reiterating the contradictory statement > without explaining it. Hm, then I probably fail to see the contradiction. -- Ralf