Stefan Monnier writes: > If the viper stuff is indeed covered by his ERC assignment, then this > python.el change can definitely go in as a "tiny change", but otherwise I'm > not so sure. Maybe we'd be better off asking for an assignment for the > whole of Emacs and be done with it. His viper changes were all ERC-related, and should be covered by the ERC assignment -- we even distribute the changes with the version of ERC that is separate from Emacs as "erc-viper.el". -- Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/ Interests: Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net /` |\ | | | Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, Planner, ErBot, DVC |_] | \| |_| Reclaim your digital rights by eliminating DRM. See http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm for details.