From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sven Joachim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: comment-beginning Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:45:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87lk8v8smf.fsf@gmx.de> References: <200711181634.58741.andreas.roehler@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195400635 11167 80.91.229.12 (18 Nov 2007 15:43:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=F6hler?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 18 16:44:00 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ItmJS-00069c-3O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:43:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ItmJE-0001Lf-OZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 10:43:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ItmJ6-0001Ck-ON for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 10:43:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ItmJ5-0001Ad-Oy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 10:43:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ItmJ5-0001AL-JK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 10:43:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ItmJ4-00051b-U8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 10:43:35 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2007 15:43:32 -0000 Original-Received: from p548639C0.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO debian) [84.134.57.192] by mail.gmx.net (mp057) with SMTP; 18 Nov 2007 16:43:32 +0100 X-Authenticated: #28250155 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19efY0808xeBfkUbVRORSKCnQ/pfOX1Ic3p+raTfh wsEvCLsX/zFcVT In-Reply-To: <200711181634.58741.andreas.roehler@online.de> ("Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=F6hler=22's?= message of "Sun\, 18 Nov 2007 16\:34\:57 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83542 Archived-At: Andreas Röhler writes: > C-h f comment-beginning fails > > with message: [no match] > > whereas comment-beginning is present in newcomment.el > > in contrast > C-h f comment-dwim displays documentation as expected. > > Can't see a reason. The reason is that comment-dwim is autoloaded, while comment-beginning is not. And that's probably reasonable, given that comment-beginning is not interactive.