From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Handle empty regexp in `rmail-nonignored-headers' Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:25:00 +0000 Message-ID: <87lk5sa1qb.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87tzkgix8h.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202682331 558 80.91.229.12 (10 Feb 2008 22:25:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 10 23:25:52 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JOKcG-0001Cy-Vs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:25:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOKbn-0008N1-Pv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:25:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JOKbh-0008Jn-QK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:25:05 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JOKbf-0008Go-W7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:25:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOKbf-0008Gg-Ff for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:25:03 -0500 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JOKbf-0004yX-9K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:25:03 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so200912ugf.48 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:25:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=4D8PtVgBY/aXG8yQX43jub73mobCb5EBs5SY/v+bPSM=; b=wEaRffEtDFic7VsGpLIvyIFUOQBJNIojUAELdq6cZ25aKvH8osZxNkFVfZ6bAk6UHwKSCfpSXXiQ/2NEKPhKfnMxsn5uzJ4aiClZoaymJ7vW9qOjmRFXGfuIUrq6LoFxBLb41VhIE2LWtyLM8LSjEeJsUMeb9XwLYj7li/FliCU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=MY4oLMzjYo7dQxG9MT9nCiul7tHoAYxNyPjYeUhDqYF5B6/nWFnU/WqjG6iAg1kZhBykFEet54h0iLPeCCzlCD/F1iwGbCwDUdqft1x2UJZAog6Ibe6yDdi850s/fBVK1jI+cdBDgslQiVvVAlDUalVWoWm0UFKm4Kz/bXcM97s= Original-Received: by 10.67.98.15 with SMTP id a15mr8286061ugm.69.1202682302571; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:25:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx ( [81.99.213.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h1sm1556772ugf.11.2008.02.10.14.25.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:25:01 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BA0B3158253; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:25:00 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:34:42 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88675 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> The default value for `rmail-nonignored-headers' is "^x-spam-status:". >> If the user wants to remove this header from the list of non-ignored >> headers, she will set `rmail-nonignored-headers' to the empty string. >> This will end up in *not* ignoring any header, which is wrong. > >> This simple patch fixed this -- can I commit it? > > I'd rather allow rmail-nonignored-headers to be nil (to mean "don't > unignore any headers") and let "" have its standard meaning of "match > everything/everywhere". Yes, I have followed this path. -- Bastien