From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul R Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Maintenance suggestion on an emacs mode Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:53:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87lk35wr0u.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87wsn667kw.fsf@gmail.com> <87d4ojxgj2.fsf@gmail.com> <87zlrlskgd.fsf@photon.caeruleus.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208897617 29903 80.91.229.12 (22 Apr 2008 20:53:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: Ralf Angeli Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 22 22:54:11 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JoPVB-0007YR-8q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:54:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JoPUV-00034y-JL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:53:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JoPUR-00034O-Ec for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:53:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JoPUP-00033q-FB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:53:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JoPUP-00033m-7u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:53:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.189]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JoPUO-0007jh-Rc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:53:21 -0400 Original-Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 26so3307352fkx.10 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:53:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:to:cc:subject:references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=eLUAzYazyY6QlLwUZNNgoOC83nVgtU/DDOAWNUfC20s=; b=PYIekgpwLGO6PpvlUc2JhNGRnSIzc2elfbSwKBmLwYSwy9zBovqm8PQK18bB7y2jN6bNn/1Ho1mejs8qdqZwhnEB41/Ygihh/kPYYI9L1FXbwOYJSY4zfFL7PKWk3/3mftA1W4W+ZxHehTg9P6wbKE+FCrN2M6/oszw4w5VhmVU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=to:cc:subject:references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=Le1La0Q+BYF1DkBfd2lVn9TqkRBlsE4009SZjimtuwWzIYejV6S2tFwjN7WooeqpcYWjffeVHEjVRGw8h370q+868ubLZLThc9u2UgRtXZ6vsBP6T0R/s5hRNlSOzJtmKxCSqZXkccPyOHSYmQZwH+78ZmTIZNm0atH036UU+/g= Original-Received: by 10.82.165.5 with SMTP id n5mr1540bue.39.1208897586625; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:53:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ubuT42 ( [82.242.132.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10sm9453539mue.15.2008.04.22.13.53.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:53:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zlrlskgd.fsf@photon.caeruleus.net> (Ralf Angeli's message of "Tue\, 22 Apr 2008 22\:28\:33 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95803 Archived-At: Ralf Angeli writes: > * Paul R. (2008-04-21) writes: > >>> ,---- RefTex : >>> >>> Those bindings are not activated by default, in this sens they are >>> much like those of modula2 and html-mode. Should they be changed in >>> the same way ? >> >> This patch change them. > (...) > Please don't change those. There are already bindings for them (except > for the last two) in place. Setting `reftex-extra-bindings' really is > only there to spare users the hassle of defining bindings in the user > space themselves. I have no particular position on that. It is in a move to clean up sources from C-c[a-Z] bindings. As far as this particular modification is concerned, I think it is acceptable because the user before had to do : (setq reftex-extra-bindings t) to have them automatically bound to C-c, and now she would have to do (setq reftex-extra-bindings t) (setq reftex-extra-bindings-prefix "\C-c") for the same effect. Not that much hassle added, and more Info-compliant. But again, I won't push it, so please feel free to argue against this change. -- Paul