From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Status for bug 3233 Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:44:29 -0700 Message-ID: <87ljgbi3o2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <4B44250F.8000401@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263063074 21757 80.91.229.12 (9 Jan 2010 18:51:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 18:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 09 19:51:07 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NTgOu-0000Ac-GN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:51:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57636 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NTgOv-0001cu-55 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:51:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NTgOo-0001aa-VJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:50:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NTgOk-0001T6-9O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:50:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36502 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NTgOj-0001Ss-VJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:50:54 -0500 Original-Received: from pantheon-po42.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.101]:50838) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NTgOj-0004qU-KW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:50:53 -0500 Original-Received: from furry (173-14-147-246-NewEngland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.14.147.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po42.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o09Ioogo024654 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 9 Jan 2010 13:50:50 -0500 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D3C59C074; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 11:44:29 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4B44250F.8000401@gmail.com> (Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong's message of "Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:52:15 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119767 Archived-At: Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong writes: > I was just wondering what the status for bug 3233 is. I've applied the > patch on my custom build and the problem seems to be fixed. I've checked the fix in. > Just out of curiosity, I've been following Emacs development for about > 6 months now and I haven't seen many NS port bugs getting fixed except > for a few crasher bugs. Are there anymore of those will be fixed > before the next release in March? Few of the core Emacs developers are working on that platform, but if people submit working patches, they will be applied.