From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.1.93 pretest Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:25:10 -0500 Message-ID: <87ljeerw21.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87pr3rny7e.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83fx4n122q.fsf@gnu.org> <833a0ndlo0.fsf@gnu.org> <83vddidh73.fsf@gnu.org> <83hbp2cxgx.fsf@gnu.org> <87aauugy1g.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83eik6co9l.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267320350 2162 80.91.229.12 (28 Feb 2010 01:25:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 01:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 28 02:25:44 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlXuY-0004VT-1q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:25:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41623 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NlXuQ-0000fF-El for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:25:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NlXuK-0000fA-Fk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:25:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37880 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NlXuI-0000et-Ha for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:25:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlXuB-0004Or-91 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:25:12 -0500 Original-Received: from pantheon-po34.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.80]:44101) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlXuB-0004Oj-6m; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:25:11 -0500 Original-Received: from furry (162.254.218.209.transedge.com [209.218.254.162]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po34.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o1S1PAsh007629 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:25:10 -0500 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 109F0C05D; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:25:10 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83eik6co9l.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:22:30 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.93 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121459 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> If you remove the SAFE_FREE () calls, does that prevent the crash? > > There's only one SAFE_FREE call that I see; if I remove it, temacs > crashes at loadup time, when it loads mule-conf. So I cannot even get > as far as building Emacs. Sorry yeah---we need the SAFE_FREE call because otherwise the specpdl gets confused. How about if you replace the SAFE_ALLOC calls with xmalloc and omit the free() call at the end?