From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Manish Sharma Subject: Re: Gmane readers - please subscribe Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:52:40 +0530 Message-ID: <87ljc8dabz.fsf@master.home.net> References: <87wrvtkawl.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <87k4rtod4o.fsf@eku238261.eku.edu> <87ljc9jjqt.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <87zl0pw186.fsf@gmx.de> <87hbmxj95t.fsf@benfinney.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O6pQy-0001yp-OZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:23:00 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47086 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O6pQx-0001wS-50 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:23:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6pQt-0004c2-PR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:22:59 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:59482) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6pQt-0004bn-IA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:22:55 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6pQr-0000M1-Km for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:22:53 +0200 Received: from 124.123.254.2 ([124.123.254.2]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:22:53 +0200 Received: from mailtomanish.sharma by 124.123.254.2 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:22:53 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Ben Finney writes: > Sebastian Rose writes: > >> Ben Finney writes: >> > Since it's an infrequently-to-never accessed service, it's an >> > unreasonable burden to expect the user to maintain unique >> > passphrases for every such service. If for this list, why not for >> > every such list? >> >> It's easy to maintain unique passphrases, and to create them. > > Having done so for many accounts and using many different systems for > doing so, I can assure you that it's easier and more reliable to just > avoid creating such accounts where possible. Other have already made some excellent suggestions. About multiple system issue: you could look at a web based password manager like passpack.com or such. Regards -- Manish