From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug 5984 Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:54:05 +0900 Message-ID: <87ljc56qz6.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <83pr1hw8gv.fsf@gnu.org> <87wrvpuseu.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272632092 21169 80.91.229.12 (30 Apr 2010 12:54:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 12:54:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 30 14:54:49 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7pk1-0005B0-Io for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:54:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48683 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7pk0-00081F-OI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:54:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O7pjv-00080v-W5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:54:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36826 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7pju-00080l-Ud for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:54:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7pju-0006OW-3V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:54:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:53256) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7pjl-0006M1-Vx; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:54:34 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CA38215; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:54:25 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 34D3E1A3624; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:54:05 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <87wrvpuseu.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" a03421eb562b XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124353 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > Are there good crashes? No, there are bad crashes, worse crashes, and showstoppers. Eli suggests that this is a Close Encounter of the Third Kind.