From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
To: Christian Ohler <ohler+emacs@fastmail.net>
Cc: Sebastian Rose <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>,
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
emacs-devel Mailinglist <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: testing framework and package.el
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 12:48:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lj6dewf7.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CA9F483.8020000@fastmail.net> (Christian Ohler's message of "Tue, 05 Oct 2010 01:06:35 +0930")
Christian Ohler <ohler+emacs@fastmail.net> writes:
> I suspect it would be easier if the convention was that a file
> /some/path/foo.el had its tests in /some/path/test/foo.el. The
> convention of having a top-level src/ and test/ split makes sense in
> Java because of its package file layout and visibility rules, but
> Emacs Lisp has no such constraints. Has anyone else thought about the
> pros and cons of these different conventions? Is there a deep reason
> why Emacs currently has test/ as a separate top-level directory?
Because the test files are not to be distributed with the tarball.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-04 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-27 15:18 testing framework and package.el Sebastian Rose
2010-09-27 22:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-09-27 23:42 ` Sebastian Rose
2010-09-27 23:55 ` Sebastian Rose
2010-10-01 13:01 ` Christian Ohler
2010-10-02 3:53 ` Sebastian Rose
2010-10-03 10:51 ` Christian Ohler
2010-10-03 20:52 ` Sebastian Rose
2010-10-04 15:36 ` Christian Ohler
2010-10-04 16:48 ` Chong Yidong [this message]
2010-10-05 1:17 ` Christian Ohler
2010-10-05 1:38 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-10-05 1:50 ` Sebastian Rose
2010-10-05 3:31 ` Christian Ohler
2010-10-05 4:39 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-10-05 16:43 ` Eric Schulte
2010-10-05 23:18 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-10-11 9:26 ` Christian Ohler
2010-10-12 3:02 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-10-12 9:41 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-10-12 13:39 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-10-12 16:28 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-10-12 17:37 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-10-12 17:54 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-10-13 0:36 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-10-13 9:03 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-10-13 10:00 ` Christian Ohler
2010-10-13 14:19 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-10-17 6:37 ` Christian Ohler
2010-10-17 14:54 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-10-18 6:55 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-10-12 14:36 ` Christian Ohler
2010-10-12 17:41 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-10-13 10:00 ` Christian Ohler
2010-10-13 14:13 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-10-17 6:37 ` Christian Ohler
2010-10-12 14:19 ` Christian Ohler
2010-10-12 17:58 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-10-12 18:13 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-10-13 10:00 ` Christian Ohler
2010-10-04 17:22 ` Eric Schulte
2010-10-05 0:01 ` Sebastian Rose
2010-10-04 13:02 ` Masatake YAMATO
2010-10-05 3:29 ` Christian Ohler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lj6dewf7.fsf@stupidchicken.com \
--to=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=ohler+emacs@fastmail.net \
--cc=sebastian_rose@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.