* just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something!
@ 2011-01-18 8:52 David Combs
2011-01-18 17:16 ` rusi
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: David Combs @ 2011-01-18 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw
To: help-gnu-emacs
Just made an emacs (23.1) on Solaris 10 sparc. Was
using gnome when I did it.
./configure ... ... --with-gif=no ...
Now, I thought that the use for libgif (or giflib?) was
so that you could show *photographs*, things like that.
(I used the with-gif=no because, on comp.unix.solaris, that was
how I was told to do the configure.)
Anyway, that and the make (gmake) worked ok.
And when I actually ran the newly-built emacs (in ../src/),
hooray!, I finally had an emacs on this otherwise naked machine.
But it sure didn't look like the ntemacs I'm running on xp,
with the large fancy colorful "script" EMACS it showed on
starting up.
No such luck. What I got was like 30 years ago emacs running
on an ADM-3a or vt-100: took no advantage of the gnome gui
it was running under.
Question: could that "no gif" do that? (I hope not!)
So, what might I have done wrong?
---
I was executing it from terminal-window's tcsh command-line,
rather than by clicking an icon. SURELY that has nothing
to do with it -- but do tell me if I'm wrong.
Thanks for any advice!
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something!
2011-01-18 8:52 just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something! David Combs
@ 2011-01-18 17:16 ` rusi
2011-01-18 17:30 ` rusi
2011-01-18 18:12 ` Jason Earl
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: rusi @ 2011-01-18 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw
To: help-gnu-emacs
On Jan 18, 1:52 pm, dkco...@panix.com (David Combs) wrote:
> Just made an emacs (23.1) on Solaris 10 sparc. Was
> using gnome when I did it.
>
> ./configure ... ... --with-gif=no ...
>
> Now, I thought that the use for libgif (or giflib?) was
> so that you could show *photographs*, things like that.
>
> (I used the with-gif=no because, on comp.unix.solaris, that was
> how I was told to do the configure.)
>
> Anyway, that and the make (gmake) worked ok.
>
> And when I actually ran the newly-built emacs (in ../src/),
> hooray!, I finally had an emacs on this otherwise naked machine.
>
> But it sure didn't look like the ntemacs I'm running on xp,
> with the large fancy colorful "script" EMACS it showed on
> starting up.
>
> No such luck. What I got was like 30 years ago emacs running
> on an ADM-3a or vt-100: took no advantage of the gnome gui
> it was running under.
>
> Question: could that "no gif" do that? (I hope not!)
>
> So, what might I have done wrong?
>
> ---
>
> I was executing it from terminal-window's tcsh command-line,
> rather than by clicking an icon. SURELY that has nothing
> to do with it -- but do tell me if I'm wrong.
>
> Thanks for any advice!
What happens if you turn on gif?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something!
2011-01-18 17:16 ` rusi
@ 2011-01-18 17:30 ` rusi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rusi @ 2011-01-18 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: help-gnu-emacs
On Jan 18, 10:16 pm, rusi <rustompm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 18, 1:52 pm, dkco...@panix.com (David Combs) wrote:
>
>
>
> > Just made an emacs (23.1) on Solaris 10 sparc. Was
> > using gnome when I did it.
>
> > ./configure ... ... --with-gif=no ...
>
> > Now, I thought that the use for libgif (or giflib?) was
> > so that you could show *photographs*, things like that.
>
> > (I used the with-gif=no because, on comp.unix.solaris, that was
> > how I was told to do the configure.)
>
> > Anyway, that and the make (gmake) worked ok.
>
> > And when I actually ran the newly-built emacs (in ../src/),
> > hooray!, I finally had an emacs on this otherwise naked machine.
>
> > But it sure didn't look like the ntemacs I'm running on xp,
> > with the large fancy colorful "script" EMACS it showed on
> > starting up.
>
> > No such luck. What I got was like 30 years ago emacs running
> > on an ADM-3a or vt-100: took no advantage of the gnome gui
> > it was running under.
>
> > Question: could that "no gif" do that? (I hope not!)
>
> > So, what might I have done wrong?
>
> > ---
>
> > I was executing it from terminal-window's tcsh command-line,
> > rather than by clicking an icon. SURELY that has nothing
> > to do with it -- but do tell me if I'm wrong.
>
> > Thanks for any advice!
>
> What happens if you turn on gif?
On second thought I dont expect that to be the issue.
More likely to be gtk or X or ... development files needed
Have a careful look at the 'no's' in the output of configure
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something!
2011-01-18 8:52 just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something! David Combs
2011-01-18 17:16 ` rusi
@ 2011-01-18 18:12 ` Jason Earl
2011-01-18 19:36 ` David Combs
2011-01-18 21:12 ` Tim X
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jason Earl @ 2011-01-18 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: help-gnu-emacs
On Tue, Jan 18 2011, David Combs wrote:
> Just made an emacs (23.1) on Solaris 10 sparc. Was
> using gnome when I did it.
>
> ./configure ... ... --with-gif=no ...
>
> Now, I thought that the use for libgif (or giflib?) was
> so that you could show *photographs*, things like that.
>
> (I used the with-gif=no because, on comp.unix.solaris, that was
> how I was told to do the configure.)
>
> Anyway, that and the make (gmake) worked ok.
>
> And when I actually ran the newly-built emacs (in ../src/),
> hooray!, I finally had an emacs on this otherwise naked machine.
>
> But it sure didn't look like the ntemacs I'm running on xp,
> with the large fancy colorful "script" EMACS it showed on
> starting up.
>
> No such luck. What I got was like 30 years ago emacs running
> on an ADM-3a or vt-100: took no advantage of the gnome gui
> it was running under.
>
> Question: could that "no gif" do that? (I hope not!)
>
> So, what might I have done wrong?
>
> ---
>
> I was executing it from terminal-window's tcsh command-line,
> rather than by clicking an icon. SURELY that has nothing
> to do with it -- but do tell me if I'm wrong.
>
>
> Thanks for any advice!
>
>
> David
./configure generates a report near the end of its output that is
helpful for debugging this sort of stuff. Autoconf probably should
include it in config.log too. My config.log is 8442 lines, what's
another 33 lines among friends.
Here's the bit that I am talking about from my machine.
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Configured for `i686-pc-linux-gnu'.
Where should the build process find the source code? /home/jearl/projects/emacs
What operating system and machine description files should Emacs use?
`s/gnu-linux.h'
What compiler should emacs be built with? gcc -g -O2
Should Emacs use the GNU version of malloc? yes
(Using Doug Lea's new malloc from the GNU C Library.)
Should Emacs use a relocating allocator for buffers? no
Should Emacs use mmap(2) for buffer allocation? no
What window system should Emacs use? x11
What toolkit should Emacs use? GTK
Where do we find X Windows header files? Standard dirs
Where do we find X Windows libraries? Standard dirs
Does Emacs use -lXaw3d? no
Does Emacs use -lXpm? yes
Does Emacs use -ljpeg? yes
Does Emacs use -ltiff? yes
Does Emacs use a gif library? yes -lgif
Does Emacs use -lpng? yes
Does Emacs use -lrsvg-2? yes
Does Emacs use imagemagick? yes
Does Emacs use -lgpm? no
Does Emacs use -ldbus? yes
Does Emacs use -lgconf? yes
Does Emacs use -lselinux? no
Does Emacs use -lgnutls? yes
Does Emacs use -lxml2? yes
Does Emacs use -lfreetype? yes
Does Emacs use -lm17n-flt? no
Does Emacs use -lotf? yes
Does Emacs use -lxft? yes
Does Emacs use toolkit scroll bars? yes
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
The important bit, in this case, is not whether emacs is configured to
use a gif library, but rather that it is configured to use X Windows at
all. As an example here's what I get when I configure emacs on a
machine without X installed:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Configured for `i686-pc-linux-gnu'.
Where should the build process find the source code? /home/jearl/projects/emacs
What operating system and machine description files should Emacs use?
`s/gnu-linux.h'
What compiler should emacs be built with? gcc -g -O2
Should Emacs use the GNU version of malloc? yes
(Using Doug Lea's new malloc from the GNU C Library.)
Should Emacs use a relocating allocator for buffers? no
Should Emacs use mmap(2) for buffer allocation? no
What window system should Emacs use? none
What toolkit should Emacs use? none
Where do we find X Windows header files? NONE
Where do we find X Windows libraries? NONE
Does Emacs use -lXaw3d? no
Does Emacs use -lXpm? no
Does Emacs use -ljpeg? no
Does Emacs use -ltiff? no
Does Emacs use a gif library? no
Does Emacs use -lpng? no
Does Emacs use -lrsvg-2? no
Does Emacs use imagemagick? no
Does Emacs use -lgpm? no
Does Emacs use -ldbus? no
Does Emacs use -lgconf? no
Does Emacs use -lselinux? no
Does Emacs use -lgnutls? no
Does Emacs use -lxml2? no
Does Emacs use -lfreetype? no
Does Emacs use -lm17n-flt? no
Does Emacs use -lotf? no
Does Emacs use -lxft? no
Does Emacs use toolkit scroll bars? no
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Of course, to get that output I had to do:
./configure --without-makeinfo --without-x
My guess is that somehow your emacs did not get built with X Windows
support.
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something!
2011-01-18 18:12 ` Jason Earl
@ 2011-01-18 19:36 ` David Combs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: David Combs @ 2011-01-18 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw
To: help-gnu-emacs
In article <87mxmy6pye.fsf@notengoamigos.org>,
Jason Earl <jearl@notengoamigos.org> wrote:
...
...
THANK YOU FOR DOING ALL THAT FOR ME!
MUCH APPRECIATED!
Will now go over to the sparc and give those suggestions
a try.
THANKS AGAIN!
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something!
2011-01-18 8:52 just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something! David Combs
2011-01-18 17:16 ` rusi
2011-01-18 18:12 ` Jason Earl
@ 2011-01-18 21:12 ` Tim X
2011-01-21 1:40 ` David Combs
2011-01-20 5:47 ` Kevin Rodgers
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tim X @ 2011-01-18 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: help-gnu-emacs
dkcombs@panix.com (David Combs) writes:
> Just made an emacs (23.1) on Solaris 10 sparc. Was
> using gnome when I did it.
>
> ./configure ... ... --with-gif=no ...
>
> Now, I thought that the use for libgif (or giflib?) was
> so that you could show *photographs*, things like that.
>
> (I used the with-gif=no because, on comp.unix.solaris, that was
> how I was told to do the configure.)
>
> Anyway, that and the make (gmake) worked ok.
>
> And when I actually ran the newly-built emacs (in ../src/),
> hooray!, I finally had an emacs on this otherwise naked machine.
>
> But it sure didn't look like the ntemacs I'm running on xp,
> with the large fancy colorful "script" EMACS it showed on
> starting up.
>
> No such luck. What I got was like 30 years ago emacs running
> on an ADM-3a or vt-100: took no advantage of the gnome gui
> it was running under.
>
> Question: could that "no gif" do that? (I hope not!)
>
> So, what might I have done wrong?
>
> ---
>
> I was executing it from terminal-window's tcsh command-line,
> rather than by clicking an icon. SURELY that has nothing
> to do with it -- but do tell me if I'm wrong.
>
>
Not sure why you have been told not to include gif support, but it
should have nothing to do with the issues you have observed.
Sounds like you did a non-X build. Look at the output from configure and
make sure it includes X and an appropriate GUI lib such as gtk+ (given
your running gnome) or one of the older X gui libs.
Note also that the fancy 'Emacs' coloured startup screen may not appear
if you don't have the appropriate fonts or have set a font that prevents
emacs from drawing that flashier initial screen. In this case, yhou will
just get a very plain startup screen that looks very similar to the one
for non-GUI versions.
The output from configure is the first place to look when tyring to
determine why a newly compiled emacs isn't looking right. Pay particular
attention to the font related stuff as you want anti-aliased fonts and
that an appropriate X library is being included.
BTW, isn't the latest released 23 version 23.2? Probably should be
building that version rather than one with known bugs.
Tim
--
tcross (at) rapttech dot com dot au
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something!
2011-01-18 8:52 just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something! David Combs
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-18 21:12 ` Tim X
@ 2011-01-20 5:47 ` Kevin Rodgers
2011-01-20 6:00 ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
2011-01-20 15:14 ` Steph
5 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Rodgers @ 2011-01-20 5:47 UTC (permalink / raw
To: help-gnu-emacs
On 1/18/11 1:52 AM, David Combs wrote:
> Just made an emacs (23.1) on Solaris 10 sparc. Was
> using gnome when I did it.
>
> ./configure ... ... --with-gif=no ...
>
> Now, I thought that the use for libgif (or giflib?) was
> so that you could show *photographs*, things like that.
>
> (I used the with-gif=no because, on comp.unix.solaris, that was
> how I was told to do the configure.)
>
> Anyway, that and the make (gmake) worked ok.
>
> And when I actually ran the newly-built emacs (in ../src/),
> hooray!, I finally had an emacs on this otherwise naked machine.
>
> But it sure didn't look like the ntemacs I'm running on xp,
> with the large fancy colorful "script" EMACS it showed on
> starting up.
>
> No such luck. What I got was like 30 years ago emacs running
> on an ADM-3a or vt-100: took no advantage of the gnome gui
> it was running under.
>
> Question: could that "no gif" do that? (I hope not!)
>
> So, what might I have done wrong?
You didn't save the output from configure, so that you could go
back and figure out what went wrong after the fact:
./configure ... 2>&1 | tee configure.log
You didn't tell us what it does look like, e.g. is it running in
its own X11 window or is it running in in the xterm (or other
terminal emulator window) in which you invoked it?
What does ldd `type emacs` show?
--
Kevin Rodgers
Denver, Colorado, USA
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something!
2011-01-18 8:52 just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something! David Combs
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-20 5:47 ` Kevin Rodgers
@ 2011-01-20 6:00 ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
2011-01-21 1:45 ` David Combs
2011-01-20 15:14 ` Steph
5 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pascal J. Bourguignon @ 2011-01-20 6:00 UTC (permalink / raw
To: help-gnu-emacs
dkcombs@panix.com (David Combs) writes:
> Just made an emacs (23.1) on Solaris 10 sparc. Was
> using gnome when I did it.
>
> ./configure ... ... --with-gif=no ...
>
> Now, I thought that the use for libgif (or giflib?) was
> so that you could show *photographs*, things like that.
>
> (I used the with-gif=no because, on comp.unix.solaris, that was
> how I was told to do the configure.)
>
> Anyway, that and the make (gmake) worked ok.
>
> And when I actually ran the newly-built emacs (in ../src/),
> hooray!, I finally had an emacs on this otherwise naked machine.
>
> But it sure didn't look like the ntemacs I'm running on xp,
> with the large fancy colorful "script" EMACS it showed on
> starting up.
>
> No such luck. What I got was like 30 years ago emacs running
> on an ADM-3a or vt-100: took no advantage of the gnome gui
> it was running under.
>
> Question: could that "no gif" do that? (I hope not!)
>
> So, what might I have done wrong?
You need --with-x to get an X gui.
Here is what I use:
./configure --prefix=/opt/emacs-${emacs_version} \
--with-x \
--with-xpm \
--with-jpeg \
--with-tiff \
--with-gif \
--with-png \
--with-rsvg \
--with-xft \
--with-libotf \
--with-sound \
--with-x-toolkit=no \
--without-toolkit-scroll-bars \
--x-includes=/usr/X11/include \
--x-libraries=/usr/X11/lib \
&& make \
&& make install
Of course, if you want some specific X toolkit, you will use something
else than no there.
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something!
2011-01-18 8:52 just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something! David Combs
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-20 6:00 ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
@ 2011-01-20 15:14 ` Steph
5 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Steph @ 2011-01-20 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: help-gnu-emacs
On Jan 18, 3:52 am, dkco...@panix.com (David Combs) wrote:
> So, what might I have done wrong?
If emacs didn't start in a new window, the first thing *I* would check
is your DISPLAY environment variable:
echo $DISPLAY
Without it, Emacs will start in tty mode even if you compiled with X
support.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something!
2011-01-18 21:12 ` Tim X
@ 2011-01-21 1:40 ` David Combs
2011-01-21 7:44 ` Tim X
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: David Combs @ 2011-01-21 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: help-gnu-emacs
In article <871v49x6f6.fsf@puma.rapttech.com.au>,
Tim X <timx@nospam.dev.null> wrote:
>dkcombs@panix.com (David Combs) writes:
>
>> Just made an emacs (23.1) on Solaris 10 sparc. Was
>> using gnome when I did it.
>>
>> ./configure ... ... --with-gif=no ...
>>
>> Now, I thought that the use for libgif (or giflib?) was
>> so that you could show *photographs*, things like that.
>>
>> (I used the with-gif=no because, on comp.unix.solaris, that was
>> how I was told to do the configure.)
>>
>> Anyway, that and the make (gmake) worked ok.
>>
>> And when I actually ran the newly-built emacs (in ../src/),
>> hooray!, I finally had an emacs on this otherwise naked machine.
>>
>> But it sure didn't look like the ntemacs I'm running on xp,
>> with the large fancy colorful "script" EMACS it showed on
>> starting up.
>>
>> No such luck. What I got was like 30 years ago emacs running
>> on an ADM-3a or vt-100: took no advantage of the gnome gui
>> it was running under.
>>
>> Question: could that "no gif" do that? (I hope not!)
>>
>> So, what might I have done wrong?
>>
>> ---
>>
>> I was executing it from terminal-window's tcsh command-line,
>> rather than by clicking an icon. SURELY that has nothing
>> to do with it -- but do tell me if I'm wrong.
>>
>>
>
>Not sure why you have been told not to include gif support, but it
>should have nothing to do with the issues you have observed.
>
>Sounds like you did a non-X build. Look at the output from configure and
>make sure it includes X and an appropriate GUI lib such as gtk+ (given
>your running gnome) or one of the older X gui libs.
>
>Note also that the fancy 'Emacs' coloured startup screen may not appear
>if you don't have the appropriate fonts or have set a font that prevents
>emacs from drawing that flashier initial screen. In this case, yhou will
>just get a very plain startup screen that looks very similar to the one
>for non-GUI versions.
>
>The output from configure is the first place to look when tyring to
>determine why a newly compiled emacs isn't looking right. Pay particular
>attention to the font related stuff as you want anti-aliased fonts and
>that an appropriate X library is being included.
>
>BTW, isn't the latest released 23 version 23.2? Probably should be
>building that version rather than one with known bugs.
>
>Tim
>
>--
>tcross (at) rapttech dot com dot au
Maybe, but it's sure gotta be better than 21 or even 22,
yes?
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something!
2011-01-20 6:00 ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
@ 2011-01-21 1:45 ` David Combs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: David Combs @ 2011-01-21 1:45 UTC (permalink / raw
To: help-gnu-emacs
In article <87k4i02jxv.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com>,
Pascal J. Bourguignon <pjb@informatimago.com> wrote:
>dkcombs@panix.com (David Combs) writes:
>
...
...
>>
>> So, what might I have done wrong?
>
>You need --with-x to get an X gui.
>
>Here is what I use:
>
> ./configure --prefix=/opt/emacs-${emacs_version} \
> --with-x \
> --with-xpm \
> --with-jpeg \
> --with-tiff \
> --with-gif \
> --with-png \
> --with-rsvg \
> --with-xft \
> --with-libotf \
> --with-sound \
> --with-x-toolkit=no \
> --without-toolkit-scroll-bars \
> --x-includes=/usr/X11/include \
> --x-libraries=/usr/X11/lib \
> && make \
> && make install
>
>Of course, if you want some specific X toolkit, you will use something
>else than no there.
>
>--
>__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
>A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.
Thanks!
Will give it a try!
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something!
2011-01-21 1:40 ` David Combs
@ 2011-01-21 7:44 ` Tim X
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tim X @ 2011-01-21 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw
To: help-gnu-emacs
dkcombs@panix.com (David Combs) writes:
> In article <871v49x6f6.fsf@puma.rapttech.com.au>,
> Tim X <timx@nospam.dev.null> wrote:
>>dkcombs@panix.com (David Combs) writes:
>>
>>> Just made an emacs (23.1) on Solaris 10 sparc. Was
>>> using gnome when I did it.
>>>
>>> ./configure ... ... --with-gif=no ...
>>>
>>> Now, I thought that the use for libgif (or giflib?) was
>>> so that you could show *photographs*, things like that.
>>>
>>> (I used the with-gif=no because, on comp.unix.solaris, that was
>>> how I was told to do the configure.)
>>>
>>> Anyway, that and the make (gmake) worked ok.
>>>
>>> And when I actually ran the newly-built emacs (in ../src/),
>>> hooray!, I finally had an emacs on this otherwise naked machine.
>>>
>>> But it sure didn't look like the ntemacs I'm running on xp,
>>> with the large fancy colorful "script" EMACS it showed on
>>> starting up.
>>>
>>> No such luck. What I got was like 30 years ago emacs running
>>> on an ADM-3a or vt-100: took no advantage of the gnome gui
>>> it was running under.
>>>
>>> Question: could that "no gif" do that? (I hope not!)
>>>
>>> So, what might I have done wrong?
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> I was executing it from terminal-window's tcsh command-line,
>>> rather than by clicking an icon. SURELY that has nothing
>>> to do with it -- but do tell me if I'm wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Not sure why you have been told not to include gif support, but it
>>should have nothing to do with the issues you have observed.
>>
>>Sounds like you did a non-X build. Look at the output from configure and
>>make sure it includes X and an appropriate GUI lib such as gtk+ (given
>>your running gnome) or one of the older X gui libs.
>>
>>Note also that the fancy 'Emacs' coloured startup screen may not appear
>>if you don't have the appropriate fonts or have set a font that prevents
>>emacs from drawing that flashier initial screen. In this case, yhou will
>>just get a very plain startup screen that looks very similar to the one
>>for non-GUI versions.
>>
>>The output from configure is the first place to look when tyring to
>>determine why a newly compiled emacs isn't looking right. Pay particular
>>attention to the font related stuff as you want anti-aliased fonts and
>>that an appropriate X library is being included.
>>
>>BTW, isn't the latest released 23 version 23.2? Probably should be
>>building that version rather than one with known bugs.
>>
>>Tim
>>
>>--
>>tcross (at) rapttech dot com dot au
>
> Maybe, but it's sure gotta be better than 21 or even 22,
> yes?
>
Depends on individual requirements and preferences. Yes, the emacs 23
version has better font handling with antialiasing and better handling
of character encoding as well as some new modes. On the other hand,
there have been a number of reports that it is slower with X over a WAN
and you have more library dependencies to satisfy to get the new
features. If your unlucky enough to depend on one of the features which
are fixed in 23.2, you may find it even less of an improvement than
expected.
I personally like it, but I don't use X over a WAN anymore and I'm on
Linux, so satisfying library dependencies is fairly easy compared to
some other platforms and none of the bugs fixed between 23.1 and 23.2
had an obvious impact on the functionality I use.
I just think if your going to the trouble to build from sources, you may
as well build from the most recent production release rather than an
older release which has known issues.
Tim
--
tcross (at) rapttech dot com dot au
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-21 7:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-18 8:52 just now made an emacs (on gnome). Problem: thinks I'm vt100 or something! David Combs
2011-01-18 17:16 ` rusi
2011-01-18 17:30 ` rusi
2011-01-18 18:12 ` Jason Earl
2011-01-18 19:36 ` David Combs
2011-01-18 21:12 ` Tim X
2011-01-21 1:40 ` David Combs
2011-01-21 7:44 ` Tim X
2011-01-20 5:47 ` Kevin Rodgers
2011-01-20 6:00 ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
2011-01-21 1:45 ` David Combs
2011-01-20 15:14 ` Steph
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.