From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] xhtml-bform.rnc: Supplement missing input types Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:13:55 -0500 Message-ID: <87lj253q98.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <878vy5ew3h.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296235703 7061 80.91.229.12 (28 Jan 2011 17:28:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel =?utf-8?Q?Nystr=C3=B6m?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 28 18:28:19 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pis7J-0006de-H1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:28:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48630 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pirtj-0004TR-9y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:14:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55056 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PirtX-0004RD-O7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:14:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PirtV-0000qm-Ki for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:13:59 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.144]:52501) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PirtV-0000qU-ER for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:13:57 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014130.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.130]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0SHDtaw015740 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:13:55 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5F9161602C5; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:13:55 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: ("Daniel =?utf-8?Q?Nystr=C3=B6m=22's?= message of "Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:01:59 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.144 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.144 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135161 Archived-At: Daniel Nystr=C3=B6m writes: > Wasn't aware of the automatic generation (shouldn't that file be > generated at compile time..?) but this is where I found the > specifications: > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1-schema/#xhtml1-strict > > And as far as I can see, there's no mention of "basic form". How do we > fix this? The XHTML specification seems to be provided in two versions: the "modular" implementation in the link I supplied, and the monolithic version in your link. The two ought to give the same result. Can you demonstrate a bug in practice? If so, please provide a recipe.