release candidate build failure

release candidate build failure

[Sean Sieger]

if not exist ../same-dir.tst cp -f ../site-lisp/subdirs.el c:/Users/Sean/Downloa
ds/emacs-23.3/nt/../site-lisp
if not exist ../same-dir.tst cp -rf ../etc c:/Users/Sean/Downloads/emacs-23.3/nt
/..
cp -rf icons c:/Users/Sean/Downloads/emacs-23.3/nt/../etc
if not exist ../same-dir.tst cp -rf ../info c:/Users/Sean/Downloads/emacs-23.3/n
t/..
if not exist ../same-dir.tst cp -f ../COPYING c:/Users/Sean/Downloads/emacs-23.3
/nt/..
cp -f ../COPYING c:/Users/Sean/Downloads/emacs-23.3/nt/../bin
rm ../same-dir.tst
rm c:/Users/Sean/Downloads/emacs-23.3/nt/../same-dir.tst
rm: cannot remove `c:/Users/Sean/Downloads/emacs-23.3/nt/../same-dir.tst': No su
ch file or directory
make: [install] Error 1 (ignored)

Re: release candidate build failure

[Glenn Morris]

Sean Sieger wrote:

> make: [install] Error 1 (ignored)
                          ^^^^^^^^^
That seems harmless. What's the actual failure?

Re: release candidate build failure

[Sean Sieger]

Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:

    > make: [install] Error 1 (ignored)
                              ^^^^^^^^^
    That seems harmless. What's the actual failure?

make install is not creating a bin directory and copying the binaries to
it.

Re: release candidate build failure

[Juanma Barranquero]

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 09:28, Sean Sieger <sean.sieger@gmail.com> wrote:

> make install is not creating a bin directory and copying the binaries to it.

How did you build it?

I've built with

  cd nt
  configure --no-opt  ; plus -I, etc.
  make all
  make install

and everything's OK.  That's on Windows 7 SP1 64-bit, using gcc (GCC)
3.4.5 (mingw-vista special r3)

    Juanma

Re: release candidate build failure

[Sean Sieger]

Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com> writes:

    On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 09:28, Sean Sieger <sean.sieger@gmail.com> wrote:

    > make install is not creating a bin directory and copying the binaries to it.

    How did you build it?

    I've built with

      cd nt
      configure --no-opt  ; plus -I, etc.
      make all
      make install

    and everything's OK.  That's on Windows 7 SP1 64-bit, using gcc (GCC)
    3.4.5 (mingw-vista special r3)

        Juanma

Thanks, Juanma.  I will try again.

Re: release candidate build failure

[Sean Sieger]

Sean Sieger <sean.sieger@gmail.com> writes:

    Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com> writes:

        On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 09:28, Sean Sieger <sean.sieger@gmail.com> wrote:

        > make install is not creating a bin directory and copying the
        > binaries to it.

        How did you build it?

        I've built with

          cd nt
          configure --no-opt  ; plus -I, etc.
          make all
          make install

        and everything's OK.  That's on Windows 7 SP1 64-bit, using gcc (GCC)
        3.4.5 (mingw-vista special r3)

            Juanma

    Thanks, Juanma.  I will try again.

And did, but with make all and everything went fine.

Re: release candidate build failure

[Chong Yidong]

Sean Sieger <sean.sieger@gmail.com> writes:

> Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:
>
>     > make: [install] Error 1 (ignored)
>                               ^^^^^^^^^
>     That seems harmless. What's the actual failure?
>
> make install is not creating a bin directory and copying the binaries to
> it.

That's... interesting.

I don't see any changes since 23.2.94 that seem likely to cause a
regression.  The only build-related change was the change to Makefile.in
in 100490, which should not even have any effect on Windows.  I recall
that 23.2.94 built with no problems, is that right?

(BTW, if there really is a problem that we have to fix in the sources,
don't apply the fix and make the Windows binaries rightaway; we'd need
to make another release candidate, so wait for that.)

Re: release candidate build failure

[Sean Sieger]

Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com> writes:

    Sean Sieger <sean.sieger@gmail.com> writes:

    > Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:
    >
    >     > make: [install] Error 1 (ignored)
    >                               ^^^^^^^^^
    >     That seems harmless. What's the actual failure?
    >
    > make install is not creating a bin directory and copying the binaries to
    > it.

    That's... interesting.

    I don't see any changes since 23.2.94 that seem likely to cause a
    regression.  The only build-related change was the change to Makefile.in
    in 100490, which should not even have any effect on Windows.  I recall
    that 23.2.94 built with no problems, is that right?

Yep.  So it surprised me.

    (BTW, if there really is a problem that we have to fix in the sources,
    don't apply the fix and make the Windows binaries rightaway; we'd need
    to make another release candidate, so wait for that.)

Like I told Juanma, I'll try building afresh and report back.

Re: release candidate build failure

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Sean Sieger <sean.sieger@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 03:28:07 -0500
> 
> Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:
> 
>     > make: [install] Error 1 (ignored)
>                               ^^^^^^^^^
>     That seems harmless. What's the actual failure?
> 
> make install is not creating a bin directory and copying the binaries to
> it.

It built fine for me, FWIW.

Re: release candidate build failure

[Sean Sieger]

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Sean Sieger <sean.sieger@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 03:28:07 -0500
>>
>> Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>     > make: [install] Error 1 (ignored)
>>                               ^^^^^^^^^
>>     That seems harmless. What's the actual failure?
>>
>> make install is not creating a bin directory and copying the binaries to
>> it.
>
> It built fine for me, FWIW.

Do you also use `make all'?

Re: release candidate build failure

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 13:26:23 -0500
> From: Sean Sieger <sean.sieger@gmail.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> >> From: Sean Sieger <sean.sieger@gmail.com>
> >> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 03:28:07 -0500
> >>
> >> Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:
> >>
> >>     > make: [install] Error 1 (ignored)
> >>                               ^^^^^^^^^
> >>     That seems harmless. What's the actual failure?
> >>
> >> make install is not creating a bin directory and copying the binaries to
> >> it.
> >
> > It built fine for me, FWIW.
> 
> Do you also use `make all'?

No, just "make" followed by "make install INSTALL_DIR=d:/foo/bar".

Re: release candidate build failure

[Sean Sieger]

>> Do you also use `make all'?
>
> No, just "make" followed by "make install INSTALL_DIR=d:/foo/bar".

Thank you.  Today I'm out to prove how limited I am.

Sorry for all the noise.