From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Testing the gnutls support Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:11:41 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87liztwx36.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87r5g0x0fd.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83mxqnmqqy.fsf@gnu.org> <8762xalkgg.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ipv3krh1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871v1m6nu8.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301688930 11959 80.91.229.12 (1 Apr 2011 20:15:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:15:30 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 01 22:15:23 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5kkc-0003Cb-UQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 22:15:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37731 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5kkc-0000Wk-5m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:15:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47221 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5kkS-0000VH-7X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:15:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5kkO-0004Id-8T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:15:12 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:40859) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5kkO-0004IJ-22 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:15:08 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5kkM-00030c-AF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 22:15:06 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 22:15:06 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 22:15:06 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8KuFyLutAiSg6RXNlOrRKmOcqRk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138027 Archived-At: On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:39:21 +0200 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> So, from the proto-stream.el perspective, you would try the connection >> and if it fails, look at `gnutls-rejected-certificates' for an entry >> relevant to the connection you just failed to make. You would then ask >> the user "do you want to accept certificate?" and show the info; if they >> accept you'd save to ~/.emacs.d/certs/SERVER[.PORT].pem. LMI> Do we really need to save the certificate? Wouldn't just noting that we LMI> accepted the cert suffice? Yes, because another invalid certificate presented by the same host shouldn't be automatically accepted. Are you OK with the rest of the flow? I can add at least the defcustoms and UI necessary to the GnuTLS patch, and maybe add the proto-stream.el glue. Ted