From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How does the Emacs bug tracker work? Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:24:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87liwi452a.fsf@gmx.de> References: <4E0C44A2.1040604@dogan.se> <874o37tqq2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309520410 11364 80.91.229.12 (1 Jul 2011 11:40:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 11:40:10 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 01 13:40:06 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qcc4s-0002OF-4V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:40:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54735 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qcc4r-0000D2-6P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:40:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33278) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qcbph-0004T6-52 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:24:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qcbpb-0004hx-Dv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:24:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:49447) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qcbpa-0004hg-MZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:24:19 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Jul 2011 11:24:16 -0000 Original-Received: from p57BB965A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO detlef.gmx.de) [87.187.150.90] by mail.gmx.net (mp038) with SMTP; 01 Jul 2011 13:24:16 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+ee0xTv/GeByE9VagtqPfaLkp/yYfchctq3858KW 9XxU147ENxosof In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:00:06 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 213.165.64.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141348 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: >> IOW, I don't find the notion of "closed" to be useful. > > I think the normal understanding of "closed" is "a report we're not > going to do anything further with". Which I think is a nice category to > have. In Debbugs, this are archived reports. They are not taken into account by ordinary searches; but you could enable that search by the :archive keyword in debbugs-get-bugs. Best regards, Michael.