From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.windows Subject: Re: Emacs 24.0.93 Pretest Windows Binaries published Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:22:46 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87liolnipl.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <4F25FA2F.2010401@gmail.com> <4F27F4A1.6030907@gmail.com> <6E4BE1E758D04283A7C3A660ED379966@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328210619 5295 80.91.229.3 (2 Feb 2012 19:23:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 19:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-emacs-windows@gnu.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 02 20:23:35 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rt2Fp-0002A6-OD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:23:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43879 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rt2Fl-0004fe-TG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:23:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46008) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rt2Fe-0004dK-PB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:23:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rt2FY-0002EF-AM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:23:22 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:51692) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rt2FV-0002Cy-St for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:23:14 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rt2FU-0001zn-2Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:23:12 +0100 Original-Received: from c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net ([76.28.40.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:23:12 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:23:12 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:wtlTMs+smQ8n6WGk1rE9GuzmdB4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148127 gmane.emacs.windows:5260 Archived-At: On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:15:51 -0800 "Drew Adams" wrote: DA> The readme is the only place we mention other Windows binaries - e.g. image DA> binaries. Why treat GnuTLS specially? Either mention GnuTLS only in the readme DA> (preferred) or mention in the announcement each of the binaries that mentioned DA> in the readme (not preferred). I requested that GnuTLS be treated specially. I believe this is necessary because it's important for secure networking on W32, unlike any of the other libraries. This is a temporary remedy; I will work on a W32 installer and then it won't be necessary to mention GnuTLS explicitly (a link to the installer in the announcement would be sufficient). Ted