From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Schulte Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CL package serious deficiencies Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:51:05 -0700 Message-ID: <87liode8mu.fsf@gmx.com> References: <33271707.post@talk.nabble.com> <87fwemcwlx.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87zkcubbfc.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87vcnibb9t.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <5tr4y6z2pv.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87bopab5p6.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87r4y5e910.fsf@gmx.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328709122 30177 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2012 13:52:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 13:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nix , egnarts-ms , Stefan Monnier , Drew Adams , Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 08 14:51:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv7wA-0004SK-Py for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:51:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44755 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv7w9-0001by-Lr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:51:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv7w3-0001bh-7r for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:51:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv7vx-0004Iw-FH for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:51:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([74.208.5.67]:45073) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv7vx-0004Is-4e for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:51:41 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Feb 2012 13:51:32 -0000 Original-Received: from c-174-56-1-147.hsd1.nm.comcast.net (EHLO bagel) [174.56.1.147] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us006) with SMTP; 08 Feb 2012 08:51:32 -0500 X-Authenticated: #67821228 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19+UjZTE5p+MhQTopMGHEpOBIrn87bxtK7suXSkMu qyD5VI7W74yGw2 In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:46:09 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 74.208.5.67 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148358 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman writes: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 14:42, Eric Schulte wrote: >> >> Given that cl inclusion suddenly seems possible, I would like to say >> that from the perspective of working on Org-mode the availability of cl >> functions would be a great help. =C2=A0We already have at least the foll= owing >> Org-specific re-writes of existing cl-functions, and we frequently have >> to cull other cl functions from the code base. >> >> org-count >> org-find-if >> org-reduce >> org-remove-if >> org-remove-if-not > > I must be misremembering. Isn't it ok to use the cl functions here? > (You would be using it in compiled code.) > You are misremembering. If it were ok org, gnus, ert and widget would not all have their own remove-if variants? --=20 Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/