From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:37:08 +0900
Message-ID: <87lioa3s0b.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
References: <87vcney2in.fsf@gnus.org> <87lioapk26.fsf@lifelogs.com>
	<87hayygl6t.fsf@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328935048 23262 80.91.229.3 (11 Feb 2012 04:37:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:37:28 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 11 05:37:27 2012
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Rw4iF-0003QG-0r
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:37:27 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37595 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Rw4iE-0000H1-62
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:37:26 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49493)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stephen@xemacs.org>) id 1Rw4iB-0000Gr-GU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:37:24 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stephen@xemacs.org>) id 1Rw4iA-0001NQ-4D
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:37:23 -0500
Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:45265)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stephen@xemacs.org>) id 1Rw4i9-0001M0-Rh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:37:22 -0500
Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
	[130.158.99.156])
	by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B8E9707E3;
	Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:37:08 +0900 (JST)
Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 6581A1A2811; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:37:08 +0900 (JST)
In-Reply-To: <87hayygl6t.fsf@gnu.org>
X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5  (beta31) "ginger" e6b5c49f9e13 XEmacs
	Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148466
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/148466>

Jason Rumney writes:
 > Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
 > 
 > > I still think Emacs bugs should be simply reported through a HTTP (REST
 > > or whatever) call.  That would cover the most users and we can use
 > > confirmation e-mails to avoid spamming.
 > 
 > A lot of users are behind a proxy.  You still have a configuration
 > nightmare to deal with.

Isn't this a Perl list?  Isn't "there's always more than one way to do
it" our motto?

Why can't we have both?