From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10134: acknowledged by developer (close 10134) | [debbugs-tracker] Processed: close 10134 Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:36:38 +0800 Message-ID: <87lio98e6x.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pqdltqjh.fsf@gnu.org> <7B067E32FA18444AA4202D7EA0562F3E@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328981868 12489 80.91.229.3 (11 Feb 2012 17:37:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10134@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 11 18:37:47 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RwGtO-0003la-U3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:37:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59061 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RwGtO-0002aS-Cw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:37:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50183) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RwGtL-0002aA-5c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:37:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RwGtK-00024q-9F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:37:43 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RwGtK-00024i-7m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:37:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RwGub-0003st-M9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:39:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10134 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10134-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10134.132898188814771 (code B ref 10134); Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10134) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2012 17:38:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36355 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RwGtj-0003qB-HF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:38:08 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:44515 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RwGti-0003q5-Bh for 10134@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:38:07 -0500 Original-Received: from bb121-7-229-69.singnet.com.sg ([121.7.229.69]:48538 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RwGsP-0006eb-Pl; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:36:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <7B067E32FA18444AA4202D7EA0562F3E@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:59:25 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56796 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > Another bug closure with no explanation mail sent to the filer. > Just a reminder that this is not really kosher. I hereby declare, under the religious authority vested in me by the Church of Emacs, that closing bugs with no explanation mail does not violate kosher laws. > (Yes, I read the bug thread and I realize the bug has now been fixed.) ... especially when the objection is this silly.