From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6339: url-filename => "/c:/some/file.txt" Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 22:15:35 +0800 Message-ID: <87lil0ruk8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sjf94tek.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1336659417 10220 80.91.229.3 (10 May 2012 14:16:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 14:16:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6339@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 10 16:16:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SSUAo-0004H9-2M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 16:16:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48353 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSUAn-0008LG-5d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:16:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37659) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSUAj-0008Ky-30 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:16:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSUAe-0004Zg-DW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:16:48 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43913) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSUAe-0004ZO-71 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:16:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SSUCr-00068A-Ow for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:19:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 14:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6339 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6339-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6339.133665949223497 (code B ref 6339); Thu, 10 May 2012 14:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6339) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2012 14:18:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44945 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SSUC3-00066r-Ed for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:18:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:59020 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SSUC1-00066j-Fy for 6339@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:18:10 -0400 Original-Received: from cm162.gamma80.maxonline.com.sg ([202.156.80.162]:41143 helo=ulysses) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSU9k-0002er-Oy; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:15:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Wed, 9 May 2012 13:52:42 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.96 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59908 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: > I don't mind which way we fix it, but I'd be glad if we can avoid > snarky and erroneous "Windows does this wrong" comments in the code > while doing it... I've committed a fix to ffap to DTRT, and don't see what else to patch. Closing this bug; feel free to open a new one if there is a specific example of a caller doing the wrong thing.