From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11454: 24.1.50; `list-buffers-refresh', `Buffer-menu-buffer+size-width' Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 22:29:16 +0800 Message-ID: <87likxxykj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87vck19afc.fsf@gnu.org> <877B41D90D8D4BB5998F2C69190EF9C3@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1336832999 17423 80.91.229.3 (12 May 2012 14:29:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 14:29:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11454@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 12 16:29:58 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1STDKW-0003uf-Oh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 16:29:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50660 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STDKW-0001IG-48 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 10:29:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45944) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STDKT-0001Hy-Sd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 10:29:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STDKS-0000Uk-A3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 10:29:53 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56321) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STDKS-0000Ug-6l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 10:29:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1STDKc-00018S-LR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 10:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 14:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11454 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11454-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11454.13368329804310 (code B ref 11454); Sat, 12 May 2012 14:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11454) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2012 14:29:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50392 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1STDKF-00017T-TS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 10:29:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:48724 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1STDKB-00017E-Sj for 11454@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 10:29:36 -0400 Original-Received: from cm162.gamma80.maxonline.com.sg ([202.156.80.162]:55591 helo=ulysses) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STDJy-0007KS-DU; Sat, 12 May 2012 10:29:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877B41D90D8D4BB5998F2C69190EF9C3@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 12 May 2012 06:43:33 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.96 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59958 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > Here's what I would suggest: Respect a user's customizations and, in > priority, customizations of the new options over customization of the > old option. Absolutely not; that way lies madness. As far as possible, outside of Customize only the value of the variable should have any meaning. I amended the docstring of `B-m-b+s-w' to explicitly describe the current behavior. That is as good as we are going to get.