From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11567: 24.0.97; WTF? ROFL! (hilarious bug) Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 20:23:58 +0800 Message-ID: <87likb5g69.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8CBD82E7-3C0F-4E08-9127-9DAE6A1AFC9D@web.de> <4FC352DC.5040507@gmx.at> <4FC3C1A2.7050800@gmx.at> <4FC49A00.6010002@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1338294306 23379 80.91.229.3 (29 May 2012 12:25:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 12:25:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Tobias Bading , 11567@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 29 14:24:59 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SZLTt-0003rw-RH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 14:24:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55467 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZLTt-0000Un-GK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 08:24:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58889) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZLTl-0000Tg-Ml for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 08:24:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZLTe-0006OS-EV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 08:24:49 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38376) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZLTe-0006OG-BR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 08:24:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SZLUw-0001Vl-HV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 08:26:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 12:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11567 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11567-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11567.13382943615801 (code B ref 11567); Tue, 29 May 2012 12:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11567) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2012 12:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47920 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SZLUt-0001VT-14 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 08:25:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:47178 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SZLUR-0001Uq-25 for 11567@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 08:25:54 -0400 Original-Received: from cm162.gamma80.maxonline.com.sg ([202.156.80.162]:36165 helo=ulysses) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZLT3-00029h-G2; Tue, 29 May 2012 08:24:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FC49A00.6010002@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 29 May 2012 11:42:24 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.97 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:60453 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> I suppose Stefan earlier hinted at something like this patch, which >> together with your earlier simplification sort of fixes the problem. > > I see. Even if doesn't fix each and every problem in this area, we > should install it (or something similar). OK, I have committed your patch and Torels' to the trunk. Emacs 23.4 has the exact same behavior, so it's not a regression, and the problem isn't important enough to fix for 24.1.